Thread: PIPSINC HEARING NEWS - 22/May/07

Originally Posted by thebat$

Very good comment? Of course the court is in charge of things, when wasn't it in charge? Did I become in charge? Was I supposed to take charge? Do you want to take charge? What a silly remark. I am sure all the details will come out soon in the trial. What details can't the lawyer discuss????
Do you know something all the judges and the lawyers don't?

theBat$

Cool off, you little fellow. I just comment what you observe and is correct as I said. Whole procedures are in some kind protection from public. I never stated I know anything that Judge or lawyers know, so why you are making childish remarks.

Originally Posted by chin-lee

Cool off, you little fellow. I just comment what you observe and is correct as I said. Whole procedures are in some kind protection from public. I never stated I know anything that Judge or lawyers know, so why you are making childish remarks.

Better than silly and flippant remarks anyday. I am cool as I take lots of iced drinks.

theBat$

Originally Posted by thebat$

Better than silly and flippant remarks anyday. I am cool as I take lots of iced drinks.

theBat$

You will probably be meeting chin-lee/newlife/blueshark,hawk,t-50, et al at the trial since he will be a witness for the Defense. He "Knows" it all.

Originally Posted by LynnRE

You will probably be meeting chin-lee/newlife/blueshark,hawk,t-50, et al at the trial since he will be a witness for the Defense. He "Knows" it all.

Let's be nice to Chin Lee. We are all looking to get our money back. Let's just concentrate on my next trip on June 1st (uncofirmed).



theBat$

Great job Batty keep up the good work !

Originally Posted by thebat$

Let's be nice to Chin Lee. We are all looking to get our money back. Let's just concentrate on my next trip on June 1st (uncofirmed).



theBat$

I was being nice. I was merely pointing out what he has been saying all along, and you should be able to finally meet him at the trial. You have a safe trip, and look forward to your report.

Hi Bat.
I have no doubt you’re doing whatever you are able to do. I believe we all appreciate though that you’re going to run up against brick walls from time to time.
I am very glad that you are there representing us in our quest for factual news. Perhaps the Malaysian authorities will now appreciate that we haven’t all given up and wandered off in the night!
BTW, as mentioned in my last post here, I have recently moved home and currently waiting for my drivers license with my new address to arrive. I need that to do a currency exchange, but as soon as I receive it I’ll be getting some funds set. Good Luck

This Thread was created to allow a healthy and respectful forum exchange to continue, irrespective of how any one individual may harbor or reflect with personal opinions on the BM case and subsequent fact finding initiative that RC and esp. our Moderator theBat$ was willing to undertake on behalf of ALL Parties concerned.

We won't accept anymore nor tolerate, from quarters of criticisms on the actions initiated and undertaken with innuendos and pathetic insinuations directed at our Moderator.

Esp. when this initiative is to serve all who have followed and shown a close interest, it is anticipated that ALL would have supported the funding...particularly from those who want the rest to understand and believe on face value, that they are full-fledge supporters of defendant, and as it turns out... have NOT in any way contributing or donating as to be expected... with the least gesture that pertains to a donation, YOU HAVE no business or voice to get involved from here on.

In this respect, any further post that can be construed as bias and negatively critical at the position of our Moderator on the field, is directly mocking us, the Admins and the Membership with unacceptable contempt given our broad tolerance shown thus far!!!

You will be sanctioned if there is any further detection of any other subtle indication with a post that disregards this last warning!!!


YB.

Originally Posted by Originally Posted by Owen Platt View Post
It would seem that Mr. and Mrs. Marsden had more than enough financial support in the past since it enabled them to shift considerable sums from the company (your money) into their own private accounts.
It is, in fact, this fraudulent conversion that is the subject of the charges laid against them so far.
Pips was a fraud from day one - the figures you were looking at were mere numbers on a screen.( Show us a proof) No investments, .( Show us a proof) no capital base of $700 million,.( Show us a proof) no gold bars in Australlia,.( Show us a proof) no insurance policy .( Show us a proof) and no "trust accounts" into which your money was supposed to have been placed..( Show us a proof)
The present fund is to allow a representative to attend the court proceedings and provide a report on the situation - nothing more.


chin-lee;204977

So smart guy, if you do have valid proof as what you say,how come you are not at court hearing as witness?
It looks you know more than BNM and its lawyers.

Very interesting.

Actually there has been substantial evidence made public that none of these, "Assets" exists at all.
They would have been listed as such and seized in the original arrest and weren't. I believe the figure mentioned was only about 17 million or so. Which by my math makes Bryan 3-6 BILLION short.
Certainly If you have proof other wise please let us know it would definitely help in any recovery others may seeking of their funds lost in the Pips, Bryan debacle
Owen statement seem quite factual to me, at least as the facts are known, but like I said enlighten us all Chin-lee....

Originally Posted by boatman

Actually there has been substantial evidence made public that none of these, "Assets" exists at all.

Not saying that they exist or do not exist, but how can anyone prove with substantial evidence that something does not exist?

Just a philosophical question...