Thread: Pips-(BM)-Trial Starts 13th of september.

Originally Posted by sopranos

Freaking ambulance chasing freak? What are you talking about?

I think he's talking about that smug lookin ******on the previous page. Ambulance chaser is right, or maybe a vulture. Here to pick the carcasses of the Marsdens and everyone who believed the dream.

Don't you just love supercilious gloating ******** like that.

NOT!


[Edit, Please do not use such language. Your are breaking our TOS. Consider this your first warning. Admin]

the money laundering charges could be based on the fact that picpay was set up as a holding company and it's business activities were defined legally as a bank (without a banking license), therefore, the funds were received illegally. this is very old news. we knew about it last year. if this proves to be all they could come up with against the marsdens in a years time - than our money is safe.

Originally Posted by laurenr

I would hate to think you were Judge and Jury at any case against me.

It appears that you actually don't need evidence to supply a vehement verdict ?

Accuse, sentence and then death......

On the other hand, some of us would like to hear the real evidence and see the
outcome of the real trial before we hang anyone out to dry.

There's nothing worse than fair weather friends.

When things are going well they are the greatest supporters,
when things go wrong they are the first to pronounce you guilty
and the first to shout loudly as they enjoy the slaughter.

Who needs friends like that !

Brian certainly doesn't.

If there was deliberate Fraud they would have found it, afterall,
that's what they were eagerly pursuing.

Brian may be guilty of many many things, the most serious though
seems to be mis-management and mis-placed trust.

Hardly a hanging offence.

Hi laurenr

I completely agree with your arguments and conclusion re. judging the man before he has been proved guilty. However, my take on it is that he has probably commited more serious misconduct than mismanagement and mis-placed trust. I guess it goes the other way around!...just read the final report from Warren, where he actually states that Bryan refused to listen to or take any advise from close colleagues or professional advisors. He kept everything to himself, even the size of assets (funds) and that no audits were carried out on PIPS.
Hm,...if that is true, and I believe Warren, then I guess that we are not talking about an innocent man!

hine

Okay, you guys can go on and post in this thread. As soon as we know something, i will post it in a new thread, as many has suggested to me in PM. And put a link for it in this thread also.

regards
admin

Admin please lock this thread so that only you can post, otherwise will have go through hundreds of posts by the time something come out worth reading about the trial.

At this point i dont really care what he is charged with, i just want my money.
What happened with the gold backing our funds?

Admin: I agree with gator. And, besides, this thread or any other has no place for personal attacks or language such as pr*ck or basta*d and the like. Let's keep it civil.

Regards,

thelema

Originally Posted by gator

Admin please lock this thread so that only you can post, otherwise will have go through hundreds of posts by the time something come out worth reading about the trial.

Agreed, or at least change the title! Just waded through 4 pages of idle speculation and petty bickering to find no news.

By now there should be some. Didn't any Bryan supporters go to bail him out or at least learn his fate? Please, whoever comes up with the goods, start a new thread! Thanks.

Originally Posted by Owen Platt

The hearing today is to establish whether or not the Marsdens have been able to find the bail money and/or legal representation. Bail has already been set so charges have been brought - today's hearing not to decide this. That is a fait accompli.
At the initial hearing where the charges were laid, Marsden told Sessions Court judge Akhtar Tahir: “I have lost everything. There is nothing to say at this stage.”
From this it would seem that, unless someone comes forward with the bail money, they will once more be remanded in custody. If they are unable to afford a defence lawyer, as seems likely, the court will appoint one for them.
The hearing on the 31st. relates to a separate set of charges and I think refers only to Mr. Marsden.

Owen,

How do you have access as to what Bryan said to Judge Akhtar Tahir???? "I have lost everything. There is nothing to say at this stage."

And how do you even know what the judge's name is??????

Were you there?????

Is this public information?..... and if it is, please, let all of us laypeople know how to get it.

Thanks in advance for your response.

Monica

Originally Posted by readytogo

Owen,

How do you have access as to what Bryan said to Judge Akhtar Tahir???? "I have lost everything. There is nothing to say at this stage."

And how do you even know what the judge's name is??????

Were you there?????

Is this public information?..... and if it is, please, let all of us laypeople know how to get it.

Thanks in advance for your response.

Monica

What you are asking Owen about is simply public information!....simple as that. Do your research and you will know!

hine