Please visit our sponsors

Rolclub does not endorse ads. Please see our disclaimer.
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46
  1. #31
    Investor Largo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    495
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Bburgess wrote:
    "just like the Swwdish embassy connection is unconfirmed and probably unreliable."

    It is the ONLY one Embassy contact confirmed...

    Largo

  2. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    This should nevertheless weigh up against the indication that the Malaysian authorities did not confiscate any bigger assets belonging to Marsden.
    So, the rest of the money is in Panama?

  3. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Blizzard1
    Posts
    197
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    BNM have stated they are not allowed by LAW to reveal any specific details of any findings in the investigation prior to an official public statement by the authority.
    Well in my humble opinion, revealing that PIPS doesn’t have the funds to pay the members constitutes revealing a specific detail and very significant one!
    Also I am certain we are still in the prior stage of any official public statement. Therefore if the claim is in fact true, then BNM have clearly broken the law. I wonder what they would say in response to pointing that out to them? Actually I think I know what they would say; Don’t believe all that caca poo poo in Internet forums, or something to that effect.

  4. #34
    Investor Largo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    495
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Chester wrote:
    "Don’t believe all that caca poo poo in Internet forums, or something to that effect."

    Right on Chester...right on...

    Largo

  5. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Maybe you dont want to belief me , but the letter is real !

    I deleted the rest of your post...Do not resort to name-calling because someone disagrees with your information. Be courteous and continue to believe what you want...Everwiser

  6. #36
    Senior Investor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    500
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Do people actually believe that when the investigation is over there is going to be good news, i doubt it.

  7. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Maybe some good news if Bryan has some money , or Picpay was backed by Gold or Bryan has some money that are not taken by BNM .

  8. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    9
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I think some of us have lost the plot. If the bank of BNM had only seized the funds in Picpay within there own country. The bulk of PIP's funds in the excess $1billion are still being invested in Offshore funds. Which they were unable to seize as they are in "ie Panama" and these funds are still being invested there would be more than enough to go around for all of us, as nobody has received any draw-downs there has been no outgoing business expenses being paid for overheads ie Staff wages and business expenses. Think of all the savings that this has made.
    Last edited by Sportingmike; 08-03-2006 at 04:52 PM.
    Michael Charles Andrews

  9. #39
    Senior Investor newlife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    713
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sportingmike
    I think some of us have lost the plot. If the bank of BNM had only seized the funds in Picpay within there own country. The bulk of PIP's funds in the excess $1billion are still being invested in Offshore funds. Which they were unable to seize as they are in "ie Panama" and these funds are still being invested there would be more than enough to go around for all of us, as nobody has received any draw-downs there has been no outgoing business expenses being paid for overheads ie Staff wages and business expenses. Think of all the savings that this has made.
    You got a point.

  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    36
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Bryan, give us some comments on this issue.

  11. Sponsored Links
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Share |