Thread: Bryan Marsden "innocent Of All Charges"???

Originally Posted by Chester

“There are other factors in this as well, the fact being that Millions of dollars in cc transactions went through and to date neither eCommerce Services UK nor Ectrust has paid one cent of those funds to pips”
_____________________________________________

“This was not about chargebacks or retention money it was just non-payment by the processors”
__________________________________________________ ______________________

BM posted those comments just a few months ago. I think quite a few members may have missed them as BM briefly popped in to the lengthy, Humble Request thread.

Assuming the above statements by BM are indeed accurate, will he be permitted to present the situation as part of his deffence? And will the court order that the credit card processors release the withheld funds?

The operative phrase is surely "if the above statements are accurate." In the past, Marsden has had a pretty marginal track record for accuracy.
However, as the prosecution undoubtedly have all the details acquired by Bank Negara, any such monies owed will undoubtedly be on record. As, I suppose, will be a copy of the insurance policy and the location of the gold bars in Australia.

Originally Posted by Owen Platt

The operative phrase is surely "if the above statements are accurate." In the past, Marsden has had a pretty marginal track record for accuracy.
However, as the prosecution undoubtedly have all the details acquired by Bank Negara, any such monies owed will undoubtedly be on record. As, I suppose, will be a copy of the insurance policy and the location of the gold bars in Australia.

08-08-2005, 02:05 PM

Senior Investor

Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Loire Valley, France
Posts: 546

[quote]
Default Re: Bryan Is Guilty Of What ???????
Those who placed loan money with PIPS did so at their own risk. However they did so on the assumption that their funds were to be used for legitimate trading that would produce an unlikely return of 2% per trading day for them. As it must be apparent to the slowest intelligence, payments are not being made as promised and an explanation from the company, now apparently a mere duet, is long overdue. If the funds are found to have been misappropriated following a forensic audit of the company accounts, then this is fraud, pure and simple. Only Mr. and Mrs. Marsden are able to supply the proof either way.[unquote]

Yes, Mr. Platt said it then...


New Platinum ETF launch? <> now I know who got all of the Marshdens' Australian gold bars that the Mrs. was stashing in her shopping bags...hee hee




health and wealth, miguel.

speaking of accuracy, remember that beauty Pageant pips fashion sponsored? the day before the show was on, BM popped in the forum and said the show will be aired all over asian regions, well, that day when we turned on the TV in Hong Kong and the beauty pageant we saw there, the one was being aired all over asian regions wasn't the one pips fashion sponsored, that one was held by another more popular TV station, it just happened that both beauty pageants fell on the same day, the next day, we didn't see any news on papers regarding the one pips fashion sponsored either, only news about the other one.

makes you wonder all those Pips updates made by BM....

Originally Posted by Owen Platt

The operative phrase is surely "if the above statements are accurate." In the past, Marsden has had a pretty marginal track record for accuracy.
However, as the prosecution undoubtedly have all the details acquired by Bank Negara, any such monies owed will undoubtedly be on record. As, I suppose, will be a copy of the insurance policy and the location of the gold bars in Australia.

Originally Posted by GeoSphere

speaking of accuracy, remember that beauty Pageant pips fashion sponsored? the day before the show was on, BM popped in the forum and said the show will be aired all over asian regions, well, that day when we turned on the TV in Hong Kong and the beauty pageant we saw there, the one was being aired all over asian regions wasn't the one pips fashion sponsored, that one was held by another more popular TV station, it just happened that both beauty pageants fell on the same day, the next day, we didn't see any news on papers regarding the one pips fashion sponsored either, only news about the other one.

makes you wonder all those Pips updates made by BM....

PIPS fashion is under the name of BAJI if I am not mistaken. The designers name. Thay were supposed to have contribute to some of the clothings for the show. This an also a local fashion show. BM was photographed in a dinner jacket and a drink in hand ala James Bond. (this is what I meant by living the high life btw.)

The fashion "house" is a shoplot in upmarket KL, Lot 10 is the complex name. Its not big. The last time I was in KL (05) I drop by and ask the designer about BM he was antsy (uncomfortable). I ask for BM's no but he said he hadn't seen him and BM contacts him.

There you have it. Does this clear BM of not being accurate? Nope. Just stating the facts as it is.

theBat$