Thread: BNM's relationship with Bryan

Thank you Melg

Check mate !

Originally Posted by Carlton Lewis

I realise that I will be certainly shouted down for this, but the "facts"posted her are based upon statements from Bryan Marsden. However, he has also claimed that all Pips operations were licensed in the US and that Picpay funds were assured by gold bars in Australia and a $100M indemnity insurance policy, none of which appear to have any foundation upon fact.
And, as another poster pointed out, has anyone contacted the officials who allegedly had cosy lunches with Bryan and who had given him their personal telephone numbers?
This is about as credible as his contacts with the ruler of Negeri Sembilan, as corrupt a character as one can ever imagine.

One thing that Owen wrote that is for sure:

We are all just 'People on a Screen'

I know nobody is going to like what I am about to say but oh well I really don't care because I have thought about it for a long time so I am just going to say it.

It is the relationship Bryan had or has with BNM that made me wonder about this. What if the relationship they have together is very strong and trusting and because of this in order to help his friends at BNM Bryan allowed them to do this so that they could collect the interest on all the pipsters investments helping to raise their stocks since they were in bad shape not to long ago.

I have been watching what has been going on with BNM for a while now and they are definitely doing better since the temporary fall of PIPS. I don't know alot about that kind of stuff so maybe some of the more intelligent members could go and take a look at the differences in BNM since they took everything from PIPS Headquarters.

Remember this is just a thought and like I said what do I know.

Originally Posted by heartfelt

I know nobody is going to like what I am about to say but oh well I really don't care because I have thought about it for a long time so I am just going to say it.

It is the relationship Bryan had or has with BNM that made me wonder about this. What if the relationship they have together is very strong and trusting and because of this in order to help his friends at BNM Bryan allowed them to do this so that they could collect the interest on all the pipsters investments helping to raise their stocks since they were in bad shape not to long ago.

I have been watching what has been going on with BNM for a while now and they are definitely doing better since the temporary fall of PIPS. I don't know alot about that kind of stuff so maybe some of the more intelligent members could go and take a look at the differences in BNM since they took everything from PIPS Headquarters.

Remember this is just a thought and like I said what do I know.

BNM is not a bank. Not a bank in that way. It's like being introduced to a doctor and you start by telling him about the ache in back and he says "i'm not that kind of doctor."

Originally Posted by melg

Owen,

yes these are statements from Bryan Marsden - and maybe people cannot substantiate them as truth - however, likewise, YOU cannot substantiate them as lies, can you ?

Likewise Re the indemnity insurance policy, hence your use of the term "appear" - saves you from litigation when you can use a non-committal term, doesn't it ?

Have you contacted the officials to find out they DON'T, or haven't had lunches with Bryan ? After all, seems that any "information" you dredge up you send onto BNM anyway - so one would think you have plenty of opportunity to ask such questions.

As for your Negeri Sembilan statement - can you please elaborate as to what relevance that has at all ? NONE - by just throwing that out there you are hoping some mud will stick, correct ? YES. Just because someone has connections with someone who may be suspect does not make them suspect themselves.

Much like your "best-seller" your above statement is based on speculation and very little fact - did you give credit to all those whose forum posts you plagiarised ?

I think your talking to Carlton, not Owen. Trust me they are not the same person. Talk about hoping the mud will stick.

Originally Posted by sopranos

I think your talking to Carlton, not Owen. Trust me they are not the same person. Talk about hoping the mud will stick.

Correct.Carlton is not Owen.

All this because the styles are similar

this is a positive post, but lets sum it up one million dollar word
and the word is "IF" while your post is hopeful unless you have hard fact to back it up and what you can only be true "IF" what you say has happened or its just another round of cheerleaders hopeful speculation;
For me I hope , let me get my pompoms ready, there that it is true
benzboy

Nobody Knows Anything

Originally Posted by mariner688

Nobody Knows Anything

How very true !

Originally Posted by sopranos

I think your talking to Carlton, not Owen. Trust me they are not the same person. Talk about hoping the mud will stick.

If Carlton is not Owen then I apologise.

However, you talk about trying to make mud stick - is that not EXACTLY what Carlton tried to do with his innuendo on the Negeri Sembilan statement ?

Or any of the other statements Carlton made which are not based on fact but supposition ?