Thread: Global Pension Plan

Originally Posted by chicosan

*****

In regard to your above post, I am re-posting it here for reference:

I doubt if chico is back. He was challenged on another forum as to why he was posting on T* and here when he had told everyone how bad they were.

Another LynnRE LIE!

So how is this a lie? I underlined and bolded a key word in my statement for this reason. Reading comprehension is definitely not one of your abilities. I didn't say "NEVER," "WON'T," or "WILL NOT." Had I done so, then you could say I lied. As I said before, you wouldn't know the truth if it came up, sat on your lap and called you Daddy. How about "I talked with the Malaysian Authorities," and then "I never said I talked with the Malaysian Authorities," statements of yours. You know, YOU LIED. You really must learn to keep your stories straight.

Originally Posted by LynnRE

In regard to your above post, I am re-posting it here for reference:

I doubt if chico is back. He was challenged on another forum as to why he was posting on T* and here when he had told everyone how bad they were.

Another LynnRE LIE!

So how is this a lie?

The other forum made NO mention of my posting in T* or any other forum. This is your mental duck soup.

I underlined and bolded a key word in my statement for this reason. Reading comprehension is definitely not one of your abilities.

Posting facts that are true is not one of yours.

I didn't say "NEVER," "WON'T," or "WILL NOT." Had I done so, then you could say I lied. As I said before, you wouldn't know the truth if it came up, sat on your lap and called you Daddy.

The only thing that would call you daddy is one of your sweethearts in the T* forum.

How about "I talked with the Malaysian Authorities," and then "I never said I talked with the Malaysian Authorities," statements of yours. You know, YOU LIED. You really must learn to keep your stories straight.

Without YOUR twisting and outright editing, they are straight....as you will soon see

******

Since you want to play word games, here are your "direct quotes" which I have provided verbatim: "I didn't say that "I" called the authorities and by he way they did mention that some jerk has been calling them several times demanding info. I wonder who that was. lolololol", so why did you say this, and I quote: "For your information...I have already talked with them." So if you didn't call them, how did you talk with them? Hmm are you sure you are not related to BM? So if "YOU" did not call them, how would "YOU" know that some jerk had been calling them serveral times demanding info?

Now you have said that TroyBank was a scam, but before you said, and I quote: “The entire group that I am with were refunded by TroyBank." Then you said this, and again I quote:[COLOR="blue"] “ TROYBANK..Re-entered a program 10 days after they folded and have paid ever since. SI...Have nearly completed the principle and interest refunds to members."[/COLOR] So, first you and your group got a refund, then it is still paying, and now you said it is a scam. Not bad, only changed your story 3 times on this one. By the way in regard to SI, this notion that they have nearly completed the "principle" (your word) and interest refunds to members is also a lie.

Since you want to play word games, here are your "direct quotes" which I have provided verbatim: "I didn't say that "I" called the authorities and by he way they did mention that some jerk has been calling them several times demanding info. I wonder who that was. lolololol", so why did you say this, and I quote: "For your information...I have already talked with them." So if you didn't call them, how did you talk with them? Hmm are you sure you are not related to BM? So if "YOU" did not call them, how would "YOU" know that some jerk had been calling them serveral times demanding info?

Now you have said that TroyBank was a scam, but before you said, and I quote: “The entire group that I am with were refunded by TroyBank." Then you said this, and again I quote:[COLOR="blue"] [B]“ TROYBANK..Re-entered a program 10 days after they folded and have paid ever since. SI...Have nearly completed the principle and interest refunds to members."[/B] So, first you and your group got a refund, then it is still paying, and now you said it is a scam. Not bad, only changed your story 3 times on this one. By the way in regard to SI, this notion that they have nearly completed the "principle" (your word) and interest refunds to members is also a lie.

Not sure how that happened, but sorry for the duplicate posts. So, now let me see if I have this straight. Chico is now saying he never said the other forum never mentioned his posting on T* or here. So then I guess this quote of chico's is also made up, twisted or taken out of context, and I quote: "WHY would anyone waste time posting in TG and jousting with *****s?" or this one: "I see that Riegel has taught "dreamer" how to dream on RC. Also YB is posting his usual nonsense." and just for fun here's one more: "Why would ANYONE waste time coming to SCAM CENTRAL (TG Forum) to engage in futile arguments with losers who do not use total info when forcing their opinions on investors?"

moncheri: Remember when the Ben Seigler fiasco hit, and Stella said on the forum GPP had nothing to do with him? Well, it seems Stella was not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. A poster on another forum had this to say, and I quote:

"It would appear that that he bailed with SOME of the cash. I am part of a group that gave money to Ben Seigler (lets just call him B.S.) to join GPP. I and the people in that group do show up in GPP’s website as being membersStella is not speaking the truth if she has stated that they have had no dealings with this guy. Hopefully the investigative trail will lead right back to her and everyone associated with promoting GPP and they will all end up in jail together."

So if she lied about this what other "lies" has Stella been telling? But hey, according to chico, what is said on a website doesn't have to be the truth.

You know how you have this little piece of thread that is sticking out that looks unsightly, so you start to pull on it but it just keeps on going and going until a whole section us unraveled; and you have a real mess on your hands? Well, GPP has started its unraveling. This case with Ben Seigler, just like the case in Finland, is just one of those little threads that is going to grow into a big mess, and it is going to cause GPP all kinds of headaches.

Originally Posted by LynnRE

moncheri: Remember when the Ben Seigler fiasco hit, and Stella said on the forum GPP had nothing to do with him? Well, it seems Stella was not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Says YOU! The facts do not prove this.

A poster on another forum had this to say, and I quote:

"It would appear that that he bailed with SOME of the cash. I am part of a group that gave money to Ben Seigler (lets just call him B.S.) to join GPP.

"To join GPP"....as a member along with 100,000+ others...JERK!

I and the people in that group do show up in GPP’s website as being members. Stella is not speaking the truth if she has stated that they have had no dealings with this guy

What a load of crap!!! Get it through your thick head!.....AS MEMBERS and NOT as part of the administration!

. Hopefully the investigative trail will lead right back to her and everyone associated with promoting GPP and they will all end up in jail together."

Blah blah blah.....as usual.

So if she lied about this what other "lies" has Stella been telling? But hey, according to chico, what is said on a website doesn't have to be the truth.

YOU must have a very boring life!

You know how you have this little piece of thread that is sticking out that looks unsightly, so you start to pull on it but it just keeps on going and going until a whole section us unraveled;

In your case, you don't just let things unravel normally. YOU INVENT things so as to besmerch according to YOUR opinions.

and you have a real mess on your hands? Well, GPP has started its unraveling. This case with Ben Seigler, just like the case in Finland, is just one of those little threads that is going to grow into a big mess, and it is going to cause GPP all kinds of headaches.

YOU really need help!

******

Well, here is what Stella said, and I quote:

"I tell you one more time, that... Mr. Ben Siegler's Global Pension Insurance Trust has nothing to do with Global Pension Plan, nor does Global Pension Plan have anything do with his offer!"

Now let's see, this person only dealt with Ben Seigler and Global Pension Insurance Trust. He joined GPP through Ben Seigler, not through GPP. So, if he shows up in the GPP database of members, that means that Stella had to deal with Ben and Global Pension Insurance Trust. That makes this statement: Mr. Ben Siegler's Global Pension Insurance Trust has nothing to do with Global Pension Plan, a lie.

No-one has said GPP had anything to do with his other programs. What is being said is that GPP knew him, did business with him by accepting members into GPP from his group. Now try to twist it any way you want, but when Ben's trial is over, it is going to be known just how much GPP knew and when they knew it. Heck, they could even be called in as a witness. Now wouldn't that be fun. But then what is posted on a website doesn't have to be the truth, right chico.

ok, now I get it... I see now that the real reason for all the GPP and Stella bashing is that you are having an affair with her and this is your way of throwing everyone off. WELL SORRY, I'M ONTO YOU AND I SEE THE REAL TRUTH OF THE MATTER....

SHAME ON YOU, LYNNRE!!!!

and a spanky spanky to you!

Originally Posted by moncheri

ok, now I get it... I see now that the real reason for all the GPP and Stella bashing is that you are having an affair with her and this is your way of throwing everyone off. WELL SORRY, I'M ONTO YOU AND I SEE THE REAL TRUTH OF THE MATTER....

SHAME ON YOU, LYNNRE!!!!

and a spanky spanky to you!

That will teach you to spurn me!