Come on people let's be honest with ourselves. While atmscmd's theory of a small return on his initial investment may be completely wrong just based on the articles about returning the dinar to it's previous rate, his theory of a slow grow has a much better chance of happening than any sudden overnight reval.
There have been multiple rumors claiming it's a done deal and will happen by such and such day. I have never seen one of these rumors bare any fruit. At this point if you believe any of the rumor mongers on this or any other forum you are, at the very least, naive, and at the worst brain dead.

Please try to look at this objectively.

I bought in on the rumor that the dinar would be $.20 by the spring of 2005. Oddly enough, it never happened.

later in 2005 through 2006 there was the fab 5 pushing their done deal. nothing came of this either.

By mid to late 2006 sgs was saying it was a done deal and nothing came of it. In fact, the movement of the exchange rate didn't start until almost 2 months after that done deal rumor.

Everyone wrote off the movement as the CBI attempting to buy back as much dinar as they could before the "reval"

As the rate continued to fall and the news came out about the budget being based on the rate of 1260 the theory suddenly turned to "once they reach 1260 then we will see the reval". this theory looked promising to some when they continued to hold the rate at 1260.

Now the rate has moved past 1260 and we look to be on track for the 1000 to 1 stated as the goal for the end of the year.

Now, tell me which makes more sense. A sudden reval to 1:1 or 1:$3.31 or whatever number you want to throw in there.

or

as stated by the CBI, 1260:1 by mid-year, 1000:1 by the end of the year followed by the continued increase in value for the following 2 years (again stated by the cbi) until the dinar is on par with the dollar?

Does it not seem strange that the moves planned have been 210- 260 dinar in a set period? at that rate the dinar will be at (approximately) 750:1 by mid 2008, 500:1 by the end of 2008, 250:1 by mid 2009, and 1:1 by 2010.

It's amazing how that fits into the CBI's stated goals.

If I am wrong in any of my analyses please let me know, an I don't want arguments based on rumors or feelings, but straight fact.

Thank you.