Thread: Pips will return/pips will not return

Been here since the very beginning but may not be around for the very end of soon to be the resurrected and restructured PIPS several years from now.

Ray

Do tell......"OWES" you....... now THAT's interesting

Arcturus

[Withdrawn as he will not be able to "tell" me anything now]

Originally Posted by way2go

SM,

Thank you for understanding.

yw way2go.... we all see the world thru different 'glasses'
not acknowledging that would, in itself, be bad manners.

Put me in the pips to return list.

Seahawk

Originally Posted by everwiser

Maybe we ought to add a "fence-sitters" catagory for those who do not have the intestinal fortitude (read that "guts") to actually choose sides...Just a thought...

Everwiser

So if a person chooses to face reality, as in wait for the results
of the investigation, instead of choosing one side or the other,
that person has no "guts"?

Wow! This whole fiasco becomes more entertaining as a result
of no solid facts! (Positive or negative)

I would agree, somewhat, Hesitatenot, with the assessment. But, the message is sound.

If I may be so bold, perhaps, EW, it would have been more clear to have said that those who vaccillate between pro and con, rather than those sitting on the sidelines waiting for the outcome, should also have their own category.

This being the case, we would then have:

Pro
Con
Neutral
Invertebrates

4D? Any comments?

Arcturus

P.S. HNot: No solid facts? Really? I beg to differ a bit..........

Originally Posted by second mouse

yw way2go.... we all see the world thru different 'glasses'
not acknowledging that would, in itself, be bad manners.

of course, that being said, my rose colored's are the only way2go... lol

lol... I am too funny!!!

If it isn't too late please put DRAGONMOM on the YES, YES, YES, PIPS WILL RETURN (but not as it was) list!!! Bright blessings to ALL!

added

Originally Posted by ArcturusI

I would agree, somewhat, Hesitatenot, with the assessment. But, the message is sound.

If I may be so bold, perhaps, EW, it would have been more clear to have said that those who vaccillate between pro and con, rather than those sitting on the sidelines waiting for the outcome, should also have their own category.

This being the case, we would then have:

Pro
Con
Neutral
Invertebrates

4D? Any comments?

Arcturus

P.S. HNot: No solid facts? Really? I beg to differ a bit..........

I suppose testicularly challenged would not be politically correct.

.

Originally Posted by weathernut

Thanks newlife, 4D, neno, Raditz, and others. It's Good to be back !

Yogi, I NEVER posted that I Hope that rolclub, would not be back, I only said , that I didn't think that it would be. That was before I checked it on the whois site. When I saw that it was still active, I then thought that it Would be, but wasn't sure. It was Just my own thoughts, or Opinion. I would like to see rolclub continue, with a peaceful attitude and atmosphere.
Thanks Marek !
We're moving in the right direction, now !

Mike

Thats alright then...WELCOME back! and be good yeah...

YB.