Thread: The Humble Summary...

Originally Posted by info4shah

No, after reading all this, my confidence is still building up that PIPS will come back.

I Agree, with those who Still believe.

I believe that PIPS Will be back and There's No doubt in My Mind

I have not posted here for some time, but that does not mean that I`ve lost the faith in Brian.

The BNM is still investigating as per this notice (old, but still in force):

--------------------------
PureInvestor.com, Inc., PIPS Inc., and its Related Companies

This is to inform that Bank Negara Malaysia, the Central Bank of Malaysia, has received a number of inquiries regarding Pure Investor.Com Inc., PIPS Inc., and its related companies. Bank Negara Malaysia is still working closely with the relevant authorities and is currently still in the midst of investigating PureInvestor.com, Inc., PIPS Inc. and its related companies.


Bank Negara Malaysia
22 February 2006

© Bank Negara Malaysia, 2006. All rights reserved.
-------------------------

I asume there might be some more news within the next few months since I have reasons to believe that the investigation is narrowing to spesific cases and conditions.
Dont ask me why and how but keep faith and stay tuned.

Have an excellent day.
solhov

Let me set something straight here please. I was not questioning the information contained in the document, nor was I showing the person who posted it any scorn for doing so. I appricate any and all info we can get.
What I was wondering was how private company documents were anywhere except in the hands of the intended parties, which also made me wonder if the person who posted it might be someone with importance in either Pips or in close contact to involved parties.

Jo

Originally Posted by njbth

Offshore-Wealth,

I think Caroline answered your question as regards to when it was written. But I will confirm it was in June 2005, shortly before PIPS was shut down.

That in itself raises certain questions that I do not have the answer to and I am sure you do not have either.

At that late stage was PIPS serious about opening a bank or just trying to appease the growing unrest? IMHO, it seems like a good, well written document explaining the pro's and con's, the profit and losses to be considered. Why spend money on something you don't intend to follow up.

Did PIPS go and pursue it further. We have all heard that money was indeed sent to Cambodia. However we don't know YET whether it reached the intended target or the exact sum involved. We have heard names of those that supposedly diverted the the money for their own ends.

Did they receive the money or was it diverted before it even reached them, by someone in the home office. Something to think about?

njbth

Thanks,

I saw date, but it did not make sense as this appears to be a document which would have to had been completed much earlier than June 2005. The timeline did not fit with what we were told about this bank deal. As most know, we heard this CamBank deal was completed and I even heard license was accepted, so why would this document come to light with June date? This would indicate no license or application was submitted earlier as we were all led to believe? So if this is an accurate date, or does it simply open up more questions about the truth behind everything we have heard. So many unanswered questions, and more seem to be popping up every day, so thanks again for posting this information.

Good luck to all, Mike

Originally Posted by goldenoldie

Let me set something straight here please. I was not questioning the information contained in the document, nor was I showing the person who posted it any scorn for doing so. I appricate any and all info we can get.
What I was wondering was how private company documents were anywhere except in the hands of the intended parties, which also made me wonder if the person who posted it might be someone with importance in either Pips or in close contact to involved parties.

Jo

Hi goldenoldie,

I'm sorry I misunderstood your post. I meant no harm. You did raise a valid question about the private co. documentation. As in all things, a lot remains to be seen.

EW

Originally Posted by goldenoldie

I would be very interested to know how the person posting this very "Private & Confidential" document came about having it, and who 'njbth' is as it seems this info would have only been intended for the eyes of those involved the inner PIPS management, and the parties they had the document prepared for.
Inquiring minds would love to know.......................

Jo

Originally Posted by goldenoldie

Let me set something straight here please. I was not questioning the information contained in the document, nor was I showing the person who posted it any scorn for doing so. I appricate any and all info we can get.
What I was wondering was how private company documents were anywhere except in the hands of the intended parties, which also made me wonder if the person who posted it might be someone with importance in either Pips or in close contact to involved parties.

Jo

goldenoldie,

I am probably the same as you. Just an ordinary person who decided to join the investment called Pureinvestor and later signed up for several clone positions with GWPI. My clone positions were then transferred into PIPS, as all were.

I have met Bryan on several occassions and still fully believe in him and PIPS. I have never, and will never, post anything detrimental to him or PIPS even if I stop believing. I hope that answers your question as to "who njbth is" without giving you my name, address and tel. no.

As to where I came to have this information, I could give names but have no intention of doing so. I did not work for PIPS, or any of their associated companies, and I have no inside contacts. I simply asked someone to send me information that they claimed to have. The document I posted was one of them. I have no "proof" that it is real, but IMHO it is too detailed to be a fabrication.

Thank you for setting the record straight regarding the "scorn" question. I did not read that into your original reply to my post. Please feel free to question the information contained in my post and if you, (or anybody else) has any information to the contrary I would be interested to see it.

Kind regards,
njbth

Originally Posted by michaelr

And having sat on it for so long, presumably agonising with his conscience (LOLOLOL) why should he want to release it now.

Actually folks it is IMHO nothing more than an internal document. If Pips were serious about opening a Bank they would have probably made several of these Business Plan/Profitability Forecasts and circulated them among those involved for discussion at meetings prior to making any firm applications.

This document does not look like a full application by any means. I agree that it would be nice to know how it was acquired but no doubt the individuals concerned would like to keep their unsullied (Sorry but I can't help laughing my A** off over this, Oh dear oh dear oh dear..........) reputations Ho Ho!

Michael

Originally Posted by michaelr

As an afterthought to the above is there not a forum rule to the effect that private information should not be disclosed and if so is this not a reason to enquire as to why mods have NOT deleted the post?

Or is it that where Pips is concerned there is no such thing as a private document? It would be nice to know where the forum management who used to profess to being so Pro Pips stand on this.

If the document were to have been stolen I would have thought that all kinds of repercussions might be waiting around the corner.

Michael

Are you the michaelr that I used to respect for his charity work and his calm, collected and factual posts on the PIPS forum? The posts that never contained even the slightest hint of character assasination or personal attacks?

Perhaps it is because I have a conscience that I sat on it so long, however funny you might think that is. Keep "laughing my A** off" and any other body parts that you wish to do away with (at least you don't have to worry about about a brain).

"Ho Ho!" Who are you? Santa Claus?

My conscience is clear and is between me and the diety that I believe in, so please do not cause yourself any unnecessary concern for my mental well being.

Neither you nor any other member on this forum knows me or who I am, so why would you think I care about my reputation, sullied or unsullied.

I stated at the start of my post that if the MOD's deemed it wrong then they could freely delete it. They decided not to (and thanks to everwiser and Yogi for their decision). I also asked that if anyone disagreed then discuss the information contained in my post and not my opinions or my reasons for posting. I might also mention that although the document was dated June 2005, it did not come into my possession until March 2006, so perhaps your conception of how long I sat on it was misconsrtued.

There is a lot more that I could say but I won't. I'm glad that I got this off my chest, rant and rave ended! I hope we can get on together in the future without PIPS supporters turning on each other.

As an aside, I noticed that my post was copied to the talkgold forum about 10 hours ago, under the heading "A very interesting read". Not much response so far although it has been very quiet over there recently, especially since the infamous "dogman" left. Anyone have any idea where he went, or even care.

Many are getting weary....even from "die-hard" so-called supporters we thought they are and yet...true colors appear...more colorful indeed than a rainbow could outshine their postumous past...until slowly, we notice the shine showing off its true sheen...

Keep going for it for it should NOT hurt anyone but empower one's desire to learn the truth...there's no need to be shameful on that...being pretentious...that's where we begin to discover WHO actually is WHO all along...

Great contributions that only deserve to be heard...but respect another poster's will to be awarded the cake he once attended the party which he was invited to participate, fair game here please.

YB.

Do you all really believe that PIPS will be back up and running? I don't understand how there are 8 hrs. in a work day on average, and this would take this long for any investigation. Either they are guily or not. If there is no evidence, without reasonable doubt, that there was any wrong doing, then they should have PIPS back up and running by now.

masse,

Simple really - the longer the investigation continues, the more $$$
the Bank officials make.

It works just the same way in the USA.

S