Thread: PIPS Case: January 4th 2007 for next mention

Originally Posted by YogiBrood

Precisely right with that correct attitude there.

In addition, for those who are still going berserk by all these blunders from Bryan, just stay perched and not end up feeling crucified and looking helplessly down at the plate of salami waiting to be enjoyed by the vultures....

YB. - cheers and Chin UP (nope.... NOT Chin Lee ) and there is always light out there when it is all done and over with the trial.

Well, as usual you like to make fun of anyone that is in support of Pips. I know that English is you second language but it is not fair that you put down or ban anyone that is in opposite opinion from yours.

Way you think about BM and Pips has step way out of line and way out legal proof , so all your comments are based on assumtions and personal feeling, which is un-proper to feed members with lies. Members here in past had come to get informed about situation and was presented to them with facts. Now they are just feed with wrong picture of situation from few that have no clue what they are talking about.

Final. if you and your boss (Marek ) think that Pips is finish, than why you are keeping this thread open for discussion.

Tell people what you feel and move on to next company you want to put down. Simple as that.

My dear Chin Lee,

I am sorry if you take it personally at heart that I might be making fun at you... IT IS NOT and neither do I want to treat you as a serious Business Brick either...

Your assertion on marginalising those supporting their right to whatever PIPS represent is again WRONG and twisted!

However, that is your prerogative to a mindset you hold and it isn't correct to say the least and one needs to reflect just how you are back on the Forum as Chin Lee whilst if we were to get personal...others assuming your past username as newlife or whatever which we banned for what it was worth back then and allowing you to return masquerading under any pseudo ID...???

You paint us unfairly for your own demise by your own outbursts and taunts of others exchanging with you on issues that appear rational but you fail to see/realise that aspect....yet, I don't see that as a major bother for concern.

There are others that were banned, not just because of what they posted or said or insinuated....but heyyy, ONLY they know perfectly well why they got banned....there are more to it that meets the eye behind the screen that they were up to no good ...but when discovered, we are better off ridding them than to waste time explaining our actions on those worthless trolls or troublemakers to prove their guilt, so far, you are getting away nicely ....so keep it clean and you will be OK to stay... and this has NOTHING to do whether you support BM or PIPS or Chiang Kai Shek or better still, the President of USA, BUSH....

Lastly, and this is where your level for rational is wayyyyy beyond the need to pull out a periscope to spot your IQ here.... letting this thread persist is not to pull out fun and thorn supporters of PIPs (you also forget most of us are PIPsters too... ) but to maintain a line open so those like you who wish to follow the progress or degress of pIPs can keep track of it.... but that is something you seem to lack understanding nor comprehend, unfortunately!

Now, finish that omelette and Chin UP....and it may help with a good pint if you did not realise what Malt can do to ease up your insides...


YB.

Originally Posted by chin-lee

Well, as usual you like to make fun of anyone that is in support of Pips. I know that English is you second language but it is not fair that you put down or ban anyone that is in opposite opinion from yours.

Way you think about BM and Pips has step way out of line and way out legal proof , so all your comments are based on assumtions and personal feeling, which is un-proper to feed members with lies. Members here in past had come to get informed about situation and was presented to them with facts. Now they are just feed with wrong picture of situation from few that have no clue what they are talking about.

Final. if you and your boss (Marek ) think that Pips is finish, than why you are keeping this thread open for discussion.

Tell people what you feel and move on to next company you want to put down. Simple as that.

Thank you for finding and translating the latest news.

Thanks for the info. very interesting to see how this case is moving after the whole fall and long wait for members.

Originally Posted by chin-lee

Well, as usual you like to make fun of anyone that is in support of Pips. I know that English is you second language but it is not fair that you put down or ban anyone that is in opposite opinion from yours.

Way you think about BM and Pips has step way out of line and way out legal proof , so all your comments are based on assumtions and personal feeling, which is un-proper to feed members with lies. Members here in past had come to get informed about situation and was presented to them with facts. Now they are just feed with wrong picture of situation from few that have no clue what they are talking about.

Final. if you and your boss (Marek ) think that Pips is finish, than why you are keeping this thread open for discussion.

Tell people what you feel and move on to next company you want to put down. Simple as that.

You must be joking!

1. The fact that Bryan is in prison for serious fraud is not a lie!
2. The fact that Bryan has been procecuted and charged for nearly 100 counts is not a lie!
3. The fact that Bryan at several occations said that PIPS could only be brought down caused by a world-melt down is not a lie!
4. The fact that Bryan said that PIPS was backed by gold is not a lie!
5. The fact that Bryan said that picpay was safe as a bank is not a lie.

This list could go on-and-on!....and when I arrive at point 100, I assume that all the facts added up would point in only one direction!


Are these facts a false picture of the situation?

Do I need to say more?

hine

Originally Posted by lightrayspips

So guys, have we learnt from mistakes? No trusting PIPS and related programs ever again. Try Iraqi Dinars - great one!!

Agreed,

Lesson learned for sure, and a painful one for many. By the way, isn't it time to change your signature and remove HALOTTO link. (g)

Good luck to all, Mike

Are we going to get some kind of refund after this is over and how long more do you think this might get settled by?

Anyone know?

Originally Posted by incomemax

Are we going to get some kind of refund after this is over and how long more do you think this might get settled by?

Anyone know?

I wouldn't count on it.

Originally Posted by the_truth

You must be joking!

1. The fact that Bryan is in prison for serious fraud is not a lie!
False:You do not know that for sure, just guessing
2. The fact that Bryan has been procecuted and charged for nearly 100 counts is not a lie!
[COLOR="Red"]False: 100 counts is incorrect, and charges are not finalized by court yet, so mean nothing at time.[/COLOR]
3. The fact that Bryan at several occations said that PIPS could only be brought down caused by a world-melt down is not a lie!
False:Certain members(and some not vested individuals) and some others that work for Pips started meltdown, which did not coused completed melted.(just put us in present situation)
4. The fact that Bryan said that PIPS was backed by gold is not a lie!
True: He was right, and you do not have a proof that is a lie
5. The fact that Bryan said that picpay was safe as a bank is not a lie.
True:He said it right. Picpay was solid till banks made a mess. Not over yet, it will be straight out.
This list could go on-and-on!....and when I arrive at point 100, I assume that all the facts added up would point in only one direction!


Are these facts a false picture of the situation?

Do I need to say more?

hine

If you would have any past experience and credibility I could may be consider your thoughts. But...?
You go back to drawing bord and start learning before making a statements.

chin-lee:

Let me ask you a question. If you went to your bank, requested to withdraw your money, they said no you can't have it we are having wire problems but come back in 2 or 3 months and maybe you can get it then, would you: A. Say you were sorry for bothering them? B. Say where is my money? C. Demand your money? or D. If they didn't give you your money immediately contact the authorities? Another question, if you did not demand your money immediately, just how many months would you give them to give you YOUR money: A. 1, B. 3, C. 6, D. 9?