Thread: Bryan Marsden "innocent Of All Charges"???

What was the actual question or whatever it was that prompted BM to have allegedly responded with > I have lost everything < ?

Originally Posted by Chester

What was the actual question or whatever it was that prompted BM to have allegedly responded with > I have lost everything < ?

http://www.rolclub.com/pips-program-...aundering.html

theBat$

Originally Posted by chin-lee

I would ask you very simple question, and I am sure that any intelligent person would answer it correctly.

If you would have everything before Aug. 30, 2005 and after that date everything is frozen an taking away from you, how you would say it differently than Bryan did?

Is this hard to figure out?

考虑

An intelligent (or even a stupid) person would answer: ...... "I did not screw you (members) and I have lost it all"!...
However if it was a scam (highly likely) and I wanted to hide the fact that I put a significat amout of members money in an individual (Marsdens) offshore account (again highly likely a Marsden option), I would still argue the Marsden way.
It all boils down to a "survival" trick!

How can you argue like you do?...and still protect a master of ConMan?

hine

Originally Posted by chin-lee

Do not play words with me. What was meant, bank action changed personal and business status, which means simply as all lost since nothing is in your possession any more.

Now don't tell me that is not what it is. Twisting of statements is very well done by you in past. Just read own book again.

Now that is funny, chin-lee (as you prefer to be called now),

Owen stated Bryan's exact words and you are the one that stated Bryan's
words differently. Who twisted Bryan's statement??

Why is it that when someone states Bryan's exact words you, and others,
try to avoid it by either becoming personal with the poster, or by ignoring
the statement altogether?

Are you changing the slogan. "If it ain't from Bryan, it ain't so" to "If it is
from Bryan it ain't so"? Hmmm....might just fit, in some instances!

For your information Newlife.

Marsden told Sessions Court judge Akhtar Tahir: “I have lost everything. There is nothing to say at this stage.”

FACT !

Apparently obvious to note as the 24th approaches, one (CL or NL or whichever...) or more "elsewhere in other secret forum hideouts" continues the "BM = beautifuly misconstrued" theory of one's own version... and it must be engrained by now within these selected herd of well wishers that stands on the edge of the cliff...

I just wonder, when the gauntlet is finally sent crashing to the floor, whether these herd would slyly make the turn around and head inwards rather than take the finally plunge and we would have heard the last of them...

YB. - it is tiring to reason with a wailing wall that sheds crocodile tears....

Originally Posted by YogiBrood

Apparently obvious to note as the 24th approaches, one (CL or NL or whichever...) or more "elsewhere in other secret forum hideouts" continues the "BM = beautifuly misconstrued" theory of one's own version... and it must be engrained by now within these selected herd of well wishers that stands on the edge of the cliff...

I just wonder, when the gauntlet is finally sent crashing to the floor, whether these herd would slyly make the turn around and head inwards rather than take the finally plunge and we would have heard the last of them...

YB. - it is tiring to reason with a wailing wall that sheds crocodile tears....

Well it might be good to be a "fly on the wall" to watch the expressions on certain members faces after the 24th.......

I Beleive Bryan and Sharon will be cleared of "Money Laundering" charges. The Reason Is that in the Absense of Charges Against Persons Who Earned Money from " Illegal or Unlawful" activities, How the Prosecutors Can Establish or Substantiate the Crime of "Money Laundering" Against the Alleged Recipients( the Couple). For example, in a "Graft Charge" case, the Recipient Can Not Be Found Guilty Unless The "Giver" Is Identified and also Charged. Simply, It Is Illogical To Me.

pinetree

I Beleive Bryan and Sharon will be cleared of "Money Laundering" charges. The Reason Is that in the Absense of Charges Against Persons Who Earned Money from " Illegal or Unlawful" activities, How the Prosecutors Can Establish or Substantiate the Crime of "Money Laundering" Against the Alleged Recipients( the Couple). For example, in a "Graft Charge" case, the Recipient Can Not Be Found Guilty Unless The "Giver" Is Identified and also Charged. Simply, It Is Illogical To Me.

pinetree

The charges relate to a transfer of monies from the Newmark account into the private accounts of Mr. and Mrs. Marsden.