"Archived", Removed. From the News Thread Here:

[DayDream]

It's just frustrating when I see certain posters playing the crowd for attention. Now.....why can't the same "THIS IS MY OPINION, DON'T BASH ME FOR IT" hold true here? It's OK to bash someone who is raising the BS flag but it's NOT OK to bash someone who is spreading "positive" BS rumors simply because everyone likes them? Why is there a double standard here? I think the reason someone said recently that it seems like IIF over here is not because of the realists but because of the Utopian Yays who are 100% intolerant of viewpoints that don't sustain their excitement level. Why is this so hard to see. Could it be the Dinar-colored glasses?

I'm sorry....but why do you just continue to stir the pot? Yesterdays problem occurred with just these same comments. Why must YOU continue to get your stabs in at Susie? Why do you want to turn this site into another iif? We agree to disagree here, thats what makes this place a better atmosphere and why MANY left from over there. Ok....it is agreed...iif is for nays....RC is for the optimists...right? The question you should ask yourself is this.....where do I belong? And then take yourself there.

Cheers!
DayDream

[bubbajr]

Sorry for my grammer! I hate computers.

[H2O_Lover]

It's just frustrating when I see certain posters playing the crowd for attention. Now.....why can't the same "THIS IS MY OPINION, DON'T BASH ME FOR IT" hold true here? It's OK to bash someone who is raising the BS flag but it's NOT OK to bash someone who is spreading "positive" BS rumors simply because everyone likes them? Why is there a double standard here? I think the reason someone said recently that it seems like IIF over here is not because of the realists but because of the Utopian Yays who are 100% intolerant of viewpoints that don't sustain their excitement level. Why is this so hard to see. Could it be the Dinar-colored glasses?

( Holding ears ) La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La

[bigred52]

Quote:
On February 25, 2006, a source from the Central Bank of Iraq stated that "The exchange rate of the Iraqi Dinar will rise significantly against the US dollar during 2006, adding that all policies will be adopted to improve the exchange rate of the country's national currency."


has this quote been verified ?
thank you

[pluginprofits]

Can someone please point me to the news thread?
Thanks,

[Adster]

Quote:
On February 25, 2006, a source from the Central Bank of Iraq stated that "The exchange rate of the Iraqi Dinar will rise significantly against the US dollar during 2006, adding that all policies will be adopted to improve the exchange rate of the country's national currency."


has this quote been verified ?
thank you

Yes, this came from the CBI.

[bigred52]

not to doubt adster : but is there a link ?, who was the cbi insider who
made the comment .
thank you

[Justpraying]

Folks things are takeing a downward turn here already this morning!

Remember this thread is for the news and disscussion of the news posts.

Everything else take to the crazy thread or to pms.

We don't want to go where we were yesterday!

[crave681]

CNN accused of 'enemy propaganda'

SAN DIEGO, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee Friday accused CNN of showing an "enemy propaganda film" of a

U.S. soldier shot by a sniper in Iraq.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., sent a letter to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld -- signed by two other Republican members of Congress from California -- asking that CNN reporters be barred from being embedded with U.S. troops.

"I think Americans like to think we're all in this together," Hunter said. "The average American Marine or soldier has concluded after seeing that film that CNN is not on their side."

CNN producer Brian Doss said that Michael Ware, a Baghdad correspondent, received the tape indirectly from a spokesman for the Islamic Army, and the network decided to air it after extensive internal debate.

"Whether or not you agree with us in this case, our goal, as always, is to present the unvarnished truth as best we can," he said on the CNN Web site.



CNN SUCKS, and this is a perfect example of slanted reporting on Iraq.

Good luck to all, Mike

Yes, CNN have a dark agenda, and undermine the war effort whenever they can. Down with Turner!

[DayDream]

Why are you assuming it's Susie? It's not.

If you insist. Nuf said.

Cheers!
DayDream