You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Yes some people had bad luck by the deletion etc, but does that make it right to put someone who is on top (who may have worked hard recruiting people) to the bottom?
Of course once lotto starts many will work hard and recruit. Is it fair to them to have their position reversed. They are working for themselves and not for others. Why should they lose out?
Yes for those whose positions are solely based on spillover, it would be ok for reverse matrix.
BUT FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY WORKED FOR IT, IT WOULD BE UNFAIR..
Yes some people had bad luck by the deletion etc, but does that make it right to put someone who is on top (who may have worked hard recruiting people) to the bottom?
Of course once lotto starts many will work hard and recruit. Is it fair to them to have their position reversed. They are working for themselves and not for others. Why should they lose out?
Yes for those whose positions are solely based on spillover, it would be ok for reverse matrix.
BUT FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY WORKED FOR IT, IT WOULD BE UNFAIR..
Do u think that all downline member will buy ticket every week ?? yes if we make some thing attractive then they will stay here long
Yes some people had bad luck by the deletion etc, but does that make it right to put someone who is on top (who may have worked hard recruiting people) to the bottom?
Of course once lotto starts many will work hard and recruit. Is it fair to them to have their position reversed. They are working for themselves and not for others. Why should they lose out?
Yes for those whose positions are solely based on spillover, it would be ok for reverse matrix.
BUT FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY WORKED FOR IT, IT WOULD BE UNFAIR..
I'm not sure that it's all that unfair...Basically you'd be giving the downline you worked so hard to get an incentive to sign up and stay in. If you're at the top 90% of the time, anyway, how unfair is that? I don't believe anyone is calling for the reversals to be permanent or very long lasting. My understanding is that they are meant to be basically a "lottery inside the lottery". It's meant to give those in the lower matrices a "taste" of what awaits them if they build their matrix. Just my .02...
This is my point exactly. If the people you work hard to recruit get a taste of what kind of money is available to them if they work hard they are less likely to be lost to attrition. You may lose one or two months of being at the top each year, but if the program is dead after 1 year you stand to lose much more don't you? Of course it still remains to be seen whether it is feasable from a programming standpoint. Does anyone know if this has been attempted before?
I am smack dab in the middle of the rolclub matrix, so I don't stand to gain directly from this idea. But indirectly I would gain because I think the longevity of the program would be greatly enhanced. As for those who "worked so hard to get on top" by typing faster than me, they should not be greedy and think of the greater good. I hope BM will look closely at this idea and whether it is feasable. I am just thankful to be part of the program either way.
Interesting,
Here is a system I had been working on would be progressive, as in level by level once a month it would reverse, similar to shuffling the deck to make it as fair as possible.
When some people talk about fair, they are speaking from a personal impact, when I speak of fair, I am thinking of everyone, there is a difference. What some fail to realize is that the only way you will ever see growth and longevity is to stop attrition, and the only way you can do this is to create an incentive within to stick it out.
As everwiser stated, sort of a lotto in a lotto concept, and just knowing that if I stay involved, sooner or later I will see a big pay day, and that is all most of us would need to stay involved. It is like having a winning lotto number, but you don't know when the drawing date is. (g)
How many hear would rather see a couple grand a month once you average it out over a year vs. seeing a select few earn $10K per month until attrition kills it off to nothing in several months? So is that the fair you were talking about? Sorry, but I would like to see it more fair for everyone over the next decade. (g)
Here is a system I had been working on would be progressive, as in level by level once a month it would reverse, similar to shuffling the deck to make it as fair as possible.
When some people talk about fair, they are speaking from a personal impact, when I speak of fair, I am thinking of everyone, there is a difference. What some fail to realize is that the only way you will ever see growth and longevity is to stop attrition, and the only way you can do this is to create an incentive within to stick it out.
As everwiser stated, sort of a lotto in a lotto concept, and just knowing that if I stay involved, sooner or later I will see a big pay day, and that is all most of us would need to stay involved. It is like having a winning lotto number, but you don't know when the drawing date is. (g)
How many hear would rather see a couple grand a month once you average it out over a year vs. seeing a select few earn $10K per month until attrition kills it off to nothing in several months? So is that the fair you were talking about? Sorry, but I would like to see it more fair for everyone over the next decade. (g)
Good luck to all, Mike
I was quite lucky and got in quite early, my number is 230. I like the idea of a reverse matrix though, in my opinion as you say, I think there would be far less attrition. Hopefully Bryan might look into it.
I am closing this thread and all that are related to the Hallotto disguise deceit. For returning members wanting to trace or track related posts concerning the current development some call it a stupid saga, a farce and even a silly & endless waste of time, well whatever anyone feels opinionated by their individual viewpoints or argument, the Trial on the Marsdens is NOT over and far from closure hence, a main sticky thread will cater to that attention
Any further new threads open just for the sake of an individual's ignorance to the progress surrounding the Marsdens or the Trial or anything else on PIPS or PicPay and all the parties involved will find their newly created thread deleted. Issues related to the past and further back in the past, will be posted in the above thread, click that and stay there with your submitted posts please. This is a start of some pruning and spring cleaning on the PIPS related Forum.
·
·
·
·
·
· 
·
Linear Mode
