Please visit our sponsors

Rolclub does not endorse ads. Please see our disclaimer.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    249
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Yes some people had bad luck by the deletion etc, but does that make it right to put someone who is on top (who may have worked hard recruiting people) to the bottom?

    Of course once lotto starts many will work hard and recruit. Is it fair to them to have their position reversed. They are working for themselves and not for others. Why should they lose out?

    Yes for those whose positions are solely based on spillover, it would be ok for reverse matrix.


    BUT FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY WORKED FOR IT, IT WOULD BE UNFAIR..

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    283
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike
    Yes some people had bad luck by the deletion etc, but does that make it right to put someone who is on top (who may have worked hard recruiting people) to the bottom?

    Of course once lotto starts many will work hard and recruit. Is it fair to them to have their position reversed. They are working for themselves and not for others. Why should they lose out?

    Yes for those whose positions are solely based on spillover, it would be ok for reverse matrix.


    BUT FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY WORKED FOR IT, IT WOULD BE UNFAIR..
    Do u think that all downline member will buy ticket every week ?? yes if we make some thing attractive then they will stay here long

  3. #23
    Senior Investor everwiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    780
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 43 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike
    Yes some people had bad luck by the deletion etc, but does that make it right to put someone who is on top (who may have worked hard recruiting people) to the bottom?

    Of course once lotto starts many will work hard and recruit. Is it fair to them to have their position reversed. They are working for themselves and not for others. Why should they lose out?

    Yes for those whose positions are solely based on spillover, it would be ok for reverse matrix.


    BUT FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY WORKED FOR IT, IT WOULD BE UNFAIR..
    I'm not sure that it's all that unfair...Basically you'd be giving the downline you worked so hard to get an incentive to sign up and stay in. If you're at the top 90% of the time, anyway, how unfair is that? I don't believe anyone is calling for the reversals to be permanent or very long lasting. My understanding is that they are meant to be basically a "lottery inside the lottery". It's meant to give those in the lower matrices a "taste" of what awaits them if they build their matrix. Just my .02...

    Everwiser
    Global Pension Plan: One Time Fee for a Great One Time Return

    "Maybe GOD isn't omnipotent. Maybe he's just been around so long that he knows everything..."

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default matrix longevity

    This is my point exactly. If the people you work hard to recruit get a taste of what kind of money is available to them if they work hard they are less likely to be lost to attrition. You may lose one or two months of being at the top each year, but if the program is dead after 1 year you stand to lose much more don't you? Of course it still remains to be seen whether it is feasable from a programming standpoint. Does anyone know if this has been attempted before?
    yoyoma

  5. #25
    Senior Investor Offshore-Wealth.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    FREEDOMLAND
    Posts
    3,277
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    574
    Thanked 2,129 Times in 355 Posts

    Default Offshore-Wealth.com

    Quote Originally Posted by sparkee
    I am smack dab in the middle of the rolclub matrix, so I don't stand to gain directly from this idea. But indirectly I would gain because I think the longevity of the program would be greatly enhanced. As for those who "worked so hard to get on top" by typing faster than me, they should not be greedy and think of the greater good. I hope BM will look closely at this idea and whether it is feasable. I am just thankful to be part of the program either way.
    Interesting,

    Here is a system I had been working on would be progressive, as in level by level once a month it would reverse, similar to shuffling the deck to make it as fair as possible.

    When some people talk about fair, they are speaking from a personal impact, when I speak of fair, I am thinking of everyone, there is a difference. What some fail to realize is that the only way you will ever see growth and longevity is to stop attrition, and the only way you can do this is to create an incentive within to stick it out.

    As everwiser stated, sort of a lotto in a lotto concept, and just knowing that if I stay involved, sooner or later I will see a big pay day, and that is all most of us would need to stay involved. It is like having a winning lotto number, but you don't know when the drawing date is. (g)

    How many hear would rather see a couple grand a month once you average it out over a year vs. seeing a select few earn $10K per month until attrition kills it off to nothing in several months? So is that the fair you were talking about? Sorry, but I would like to see it more fair for everyone over the next decade. (g)

    Good luck to all, Mike

  6. #26
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    25
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Sounds like a Great Idea to Me!

    Quote Originally Posted by Offshore-Wealth.com
    Interesting,

    Here is a system I had been working on would be progressive, as in level by level once a month it would reverse, similar to shuffling the deck to make it as fair as possible.

    When some people talk about fair, they are speaking from a personal impact, when I speak of fair, I am thinking of everyone, there is a difference. What some fail to realize is that the only way you will ever see growth and longevity is to stop attrition, and the only way you can do this is to create an incentive within to stick it out.

    As everwiser stated, sort of a lotto in a lotto concept, and just knowing that if I stay involved, sooner or later I will see a big pay day, and that is all most of us would need to stay involved. It is like having a winning lotto number, but you don't know when the drawing date is. (g)

    How many hear would rather see a couple grand a month once you average it out over a year vs. seeing a select few earn $10K per month until attrition kills it off to nothing in several months? So is that the fair you were talking about? Sorry, but I would like to see it more fair for everyone over the next decade. (g)

    Good luck to all, Mike
    I was quite lucky and got in quite early, my number is 230. I like the idea of a reverse matrix though, in my opinion as you say, I think there would be far less attrition. Hopefully Bryan might look into it.

    Good Luck to all!
    pips4me

  7. #27
    Co-Admin YogiBrood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Occasionally somewhere but NOT just anywhere...
    Posts
    5,881
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    1,658
    Thanked 1,935 Times in 650 Posts

    Default

    I am closing this thread and all that are related to the Hallotto disguise deceit. For returning members wanting to trace or track related posts concerning the current development some call it a stupid saga, a farce and even a silly & endless waste of time, well whatever anyone feels opinionated by their individual viewpoints or argument, the Trial on the Marsdens is NOT over and far from closure hence, a main sticky thread will cater to that attention

    at this link>>>:

    Any further new threads open just for the sake of an individual's ignorance to the progress surrounding the Marsdens or the Trial or anything else on PIPS or PicPay and all the parties involved will find their newly created thread deleted. Issues related to the past and further back in the past, will be posted in the above thread, click that and stay there with your submitted posts please. This is a start of some pruning and spring cleaning on the PIPS related Forum.

    Have U confirmed or R U satisfied with answer to your post? Click the "Thanks" button to show it.


    My new Android experience, the>> Samsung S2 & this special>> APP to go with it.

  8. Sponsored Links
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Share |