28-Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job

[gator]

More and more inside people are coming forward to tell what they know!


A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11
explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his
convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and
the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled
demolition.

Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a
National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA's Office of
Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since
then he has written numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies.

"David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got
to say I think that it was too," said Christison.

Christison initially approached the subject unwilling to even consider
that elements of the government could be engaged in such heights of
criminality but his research quickly began to change his mind.

"Just about half a year ago it dawned on me that not only was I trying
to avoid an issue that might be extraordinarily important - more
important than any other issue," said Christison.

"I have since decided that... at least some elements in this US
government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to
happen or at least allowing it to happen."

Christison stated that the suspicious collapse of the three buildings,
including building 7 which wasn't hit by a plane, were likely the
result of controlled demolitions.

"The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell
all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just
being hit by two airplanes."

Referencing the 2.3 trillion dollars that was discovered to be missing
from the Pentagon's coffers, Christison emphasized the fact that with
an unlimited budget, the scope of operations that could be undertaken
by the military-industrial complex are almost without recourse.

"There is so much money now sloshing around throughout not only the CIA
but the intelligence components of the Defense Department - which are
actually bigger than the CIA - that these guys can do almost anything
they want these days."

Christison said that one of the subsidiary motives behind 9/11 was to
take attention away from an impending exposure of the missing trillions
and criminal proceedings against high officials - just as LBJ had
Kennedy assassinated partly to delay imminent corruption probes that
would have sent him to prison.

Christison is just the latest in a deluge of former government and
intelligence agency insiders to boldly go public with their doubts
about the official story behind 9/11 and he has an urgent message for
future whistleblowers who might be considering the same course of action.

"We have got to be willing to be discredited, we have got to stick our
necks out - this is just plain too important."

Click the Link to read the entire article:
28-Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job

[track88]

Hi gator,
I've been investigating this for 2 years now and am completely
convinced that this was an inside job. It's the only way that
the government could get the masses to accept an invasion
into Iraq. The government knows that eventually every sane
person will realise the truth, but by that time it doesn't really
matter anymore. The dastedly deed has already been done.

For those who want to know the truth, (most don't want to
and just hide their heads in the sand) go to the following site.
It's very interesting.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
One day we'll wake up and realise what kind of people are running
this world. It ain't pretty

[d-man]

Hi gator,
I've been investigating this for 2 years now and am completely
convinced that this was an inside job. It's the only way that
the government could get the masses to accept an invasion
into Iraq. The government knows that eventually every sane
person will realise the truth, but by that time it doesn't really
matter anymore. The dastedly deed has already been done.

For those who want to know the truth, (most don't want to
and just hide their heads in the sand) go to the following site.
It's very interesting.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
One day we'll wake up and realise what kind of people are running
this world. It ain't pretty

Don't forget the moron from Texas A & M. He is a member of the great Scholars for 9/11 Truth. This moron said that no planes flew into the Trade Centers. He said it was all the media to make it up. I love who you people hang your hats on. By the way Gator, do you think there were no planes that flew into the Towers. What about you track88? So I guess the eyewitnesses all lied right?
Thanks for the laughs Gator.

[track88]

It makes me laugh that morons like you (d-man), can believe
such hogwash from a government with a leader whose IQ is
only 110...just above the level of a monkey!!! I guess you'all
voted him in so it means that you must more stupid than him...
and therefore easily duped.
No I don't believe as this guy thinks but there are so many
other unanswered questions that if you'd care to pull your
head out from where the sun don't shine...you might just get
a clue.

[nej]

110 is not just above the level of a monkey... 100 is the average human IQ, apparantly. Not that I think he's a great guy or anything! I still think he's an id!ot. Just an id!ot with a slightly above average IQ.

But, I still can't believe that the US would fly planes into their own landmark buildings, kill thousands, cause billions of dollars worth of damage, when a much smaller scale attack would've done.

And in any case, why would they want to cause all this death/destruction, so that they could then go and spend further trillions fighting a war? And even then they went to Afghanistan. Iraq came later, a couple of years after 9/11.

Is it for oil? Possibly. But there's easier ways of getting it than this. Money talks, and oil (and governments!) can be bought. The amount spent on the war does not make sense if they are after oil as they could've obtained it easier and cheaper if they wanted.

Maybe the owners of the WTC had discovered dry rot or something and it was all a big insurance scam.

[Invest007]

it was all a big insurance scam.

You may be partially right there.

And in any case, why would they want to cause all this death/destruction, so that they could then go and spend further trillions fighting a war? And even then they went to Afghanistan. Iraq came later, a couple of years after 9/11.

Taken from the link below:
• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;

• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;

• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;

• we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

Is it for oil? Possibly. But there's easier ways of getting it than this. Money talks, and oil (and governments!) can be bought. The amount spent on the war does not make sense if they are after oil as they could've obtained it easier and cheaper if they wanted.

It is for Israeli benefit - Iraq was deemed a threat to Israel.

Here is a bit of light reading (some of the principals are absolutly horrifying):
Welcome to the Project for the New American Century

[nej]

Hmm, I'd have thought Iran was a bigger Israeli threat than Iraq these days.

I'll have a read of that site.

[Invest007]

...taken from the site - they can only take on 2 theater wars at a time

[track88]

Here's something to ponder:
Ok, the 2 towers were hit by planes and they were on fire.
Then after an hour 1 of them collapsed...now never before
has a steel skyscraper collapsed due fire...so the 2 towers came down,
but what about the 3rd tower, world trade tower 7. Now that is
a 47 storey building. No plane smashed into it. It had a few fires
on a few floors. It also collapsed. How did it collapse? Well this is what
happened:
* The roofs dips inward
* Explosions are visible running up on the right side
* Explosions are visible in the front
* Simultaneous symmetrical collapse (all joints fail at the same time)
* Falls at free-fall speed
* Falls into its own footprint without damaging surrounding buildings.

Now this is exactly how a controlled demolition would occur.


Building 7 was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001. According to the government, small fires leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.

The team who investigated the collapse were not allowed access to the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report, the evidence had been destroyed.

Why did the government rapidly recycle the steel from the largest and most mysterious engineering failure in world history, and why has the media remained silent?

Anyone getting a clue yet???

[nej]

Ok, but what was the point in flattening building 7 as well? Especially since no plane hit it? Surely that would only add fire (no pun intended!) to the conspiracy theories?

Look at The Best Page In The Universe. for a nice, down-to-earth point of view.