The way it was posted in old PIPS forum, it happened as follow: After months of non-payments from PIPS, Speeddy Wallet account balances become negative and Speedy Wallet started to close accounts. To mention that Speedy Wallet was working smoothly, the only justification we were given for not using it for payments was because it was not fair to go ahead of those waiting for bank transfers. He needed an incident (acounts to be closed) in order to pay some attention to Speedy Wallet. Speedy Walled reversed everybody's account back to 0, using their own money (wonder why didn't PIPS do it instead).Quote:
Originally Posted by paddyfield
Instead to start paying the debit card requests, he came with the iddea that Speedy Wallet should implement a better platform, so we can do a withdraw to the bank from the card (what was wrong with withdrawing the money from the ATM's?).
After 2 months Speedy Wallet implemented the platform at his end. PIPS never did the implementation on its side, as Bryan didn't sign the contract (never giving a reason why). People in office were saying that the contract is waiting on his desk. He initiated the platform and I suppose, as a skilled businessman, he negociated the terms too, before the implementation. Yet he didn't sign the contract, and in his typical manner, he totally ignored our requests to be informed why.