I don't think I am explaining myself for you YB.Quote:
Originally Posted by YogiBrood
The reporters covering Watergate had vested interests - a story, the possibility of a Pulizer prize maybe and they were doing their job for a salary.
Here, we have a pro-pipster who, for his/her own personal glory is showing off the information (still incomplete) to the opposition for no reward whatsoever.
They could cost you, me, Bryan and the rest of the members our vested interests in our Pips accounts and you ask me to put aside my personal interests? Am I understanding you correctly?