Originally Posted by SoulSurfer
Everwiser, care to explain why "Just Numbers on a Screen" was locked?
Someone researches PIPS for months and writes a book; is that not worthy of an open-ended discussion? Or is this a case of "when denial turns to censorship"? Are the words "just numbers on a screen" too painful to have floating up and down on your PIPS program page?
The real question stands (unanswered): Why would Bryan Marsden endorse the posting of soaring individual account totals as late as the middle of August if they did not correspond to the exact truth of the situation? (And, what is the moral justification for doing so?)
I could offer a "top three" list of possible reasons, but I defer to those of you who have more knowledge or are wiser than I am. Please inform me. Or, if you just believe that the numbers were correct, say so and explain why.