Anyone in direct contact with Bryan/Sharon?

Printable View

19-09-2005, 09:51 AM
IMN

Anyone in direct contact with Bryan/Sharon?

To those who claim to have direct contact with Bryan/Sharon,

I urgently need to communicate with Bryan or Sharon. It is concerning the letter from the Central Bank of Malaysia which a relative of mine received (I introduced him to Pips).

I need an urgent response, please, the appointment with Bank Negara Malaysia (the correct acronym being BNM) is on September 26, 2005.

If anyone can help with this, kindly PM me. I tried the admin of ROLclub but I guess he's too busy to reply to PMs.

Best regards.
19-09-2005, 10:14 AM
lutwyche

What good will this do . Bryan won't discuss anything re Pips with you and the bank won't either .
Put your energies into something more constructive .
19-09-2005, 10:24 AM
Wacky

you'd be better off trying to contact someone NEAR BM rather than him directly... he's busy!

You can still send a letter to BM at BNM... the adress is lying somewhere around here.
19-09-2005, 10:29 AM
IMN

Quote:

Originally Posted by lutwyche

What good will this do . Bryan won't discuss anything re Pips with you and the bank won't either .
Put your energies into something more constructive .

Lutwyche,

You don't know the contents of this letter but believe me if I had the chance to speak/meet with Bryan personally, he would at least listen. To me, what I am actually doing IS constructive. As Nelsonlee once commented, "if you know 50% or nothing about the truth, say NOTHING" (not his exact words, just from memory).

I am close to where Bryan is, so I don't see this as a big problem.

No offence intended.

Regards.
19-09-2005, 10:58 AM
Admin

i am sorry mate, i cant hand out any information like this.

Sorry!

admin
19-09-2005, 11:02 AM
IMN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin

i am sorry mate, i cant hand out any information like this.

Sorry!

admin

Hello Marek,

Don't worry about it. I can understand your position.

I just thought you were too busy to reply.

Regards.
19-09-2005, 11:34 AM
ROLmania

Quote:

Originally Posted by IMN

Lutwyche,

You don't know the contents of this letter but believe me if I had the chance to speak/meet with Bryan personally, he would at least listen.

OK Well is the letter positive in nature or negative? Can you give us a little more idea of what the letter contained? Just curious....
19-09-2005, 04:35 PM
IMN

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROLmania

OK Well is the letter positive in nature or negative? Can you give us a little more idea of what the letter contained? Just curious....

Sorry, ROLmania,

I can't disclose, in public, the contents of the letter, suffice to say that it is negative for Bryan and Pips if the Pipster doesn't answer 'appropriately' when the authorities interview him on the 26th.

I don't need to stir up any trouble. I just need help to meet with Bryan, if not as a member, at least as a friend.....before the 26th.

Regards,
19-09-2005, 05:22 PM
way2go

IMN,

Did you contact the bank first, or the bank is contacting Malaysian members as part of the investigation?

Thank you and good luck at the meeting.
19-09-2005, 05:23 PM
bali

I have copied and pasted your request and pass this to someone. I hope he/she will get in touch with you soon,

Bali
19-09-2005, 05:30 PM
IMN

Hi Bali,

I hope he/she will contact me, too.

Thank you for your help.
19-09-2005, 05:38 PM
IMN

Quote:

Originally Posted by way2go

IMN,

Did you contact the bank first, or the bank is contacting Malaysian members as part of the investigation?

Thank you and good luck at the meeting.

Hi way2go,

As I stated at the start of this thread, my relative whom I introduced into Pips was the one who received the letter from the bank. I did not receive the letter, so, I am assuming at this juncture, they are contacting Malaysian Pipsters randomly.

Best regards.
19-09-2005, 07:16 PM
brotherbear

please try to contact nelsonlee on this forum and ask him for help - he will assist you as best he can I'm sure. He's very good.

BB.
19-09-2005, 07:48 PM
Admin

OKay,i have sent you an PM. I read through your PM again, Please answer to the PM, and i will see what i can do.

Marek
19-09-2005, 09:16 PM
Don

Any CEO of a major company, especially one that is being investigated has legal counsel. They would suggest that any communication be done through them. If the information is important they would know what to do with it.
Just a thought.
19-09-2005, 09:28 PM
loafer

Food for thought! Just because someone is inquiring does not mean anyone has to respond! Don't take council from your fears. No one has to answer anything if they do not want to!!!!!!!!!!!! You have the right to remain silent! You have the right to ask them questions or send them a questionnaire, i.e What they intend to do with your answers? Why do they ask? Who will they be sharing your answers with? Will they be kept confidential, etc., etc. Come on - use your heads! You have the right -to not respond and not to answer any questions. You have the right not to even accept the letter. It ceases to amaze me how naive people can be at times. You have the right to just ignore it.
19-09-2005, 10:17 PM
weseeall

THe best response to this letter -- Especially if there is a request to answer questions and as long as it is not a legal summons -- would be to return a copy of the letter togrther with one of the petitions being drawn up stating that the member was satisfied with Bryans management of the company and supported PIPS and request that BOM come to a speedy conclusion to the investigation that will let Bryan continue with the humanitarian wrk that he started and state that this as all you know about the situation and can answer no further questions.

If we can get everyone that gets a letter to respond the same then for us it would be like circling the wagons -- sure everyone has seen this in the old western movies -- when the Indians were comming the wagons was used to form the fighting circle.
19-09-2005, 10:25 PM
argon

I don't think that way Robert,

This is Malaysia and as far as I know you have to attend to these summons. Your best off to speak the truth without telling them to hurry up etc. Just answer questions without being negative seems the best to me.

Always easy to tell someone else what to say or do ...... we don't have to sit there ....
20-09-2005, 01:46 AM
hirok

To tell the truth based on one's conscience is the best. Do not consult with a lawyer to prepare an answer. A technicality will not influence the investigator. What you feel in your in the bottom of heart about Bryan and PIPS is most important and will have an influence on the investigator who is also a human.
20-09-2005, 02:18 AM
Pippydo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don

Any CEO of a major company, especially one that is being investigated has legal counsel. They would suggest that any communication be done through them. If the information is important they would know what to do with it.
Just a thought.

Bingo makes one wonder....doesn't it !
20-09-2005, 02:29 AM
BlessedAmerican

Quote:

Originally Posted by IMN

To those who claim to have direct contact with Bryan/Sharon,

I urgently need to communicate with Bryan or Sharon. It is concerning the letter from the Central Bank of Malaysia which a relative of mine received (I introduced him to Pips).

I need an urgent response, please, the appointment with Bank Negara Malaysia (the correct acronym being BNM) is on September 26, 2005.

If anyone can help with this, kindly PM me. I tried the admin of ROLclub but I guess he's too busy to reply to PMs.

Best regards.

His cell phone number is listed over at TG. Along with Sharon's and some of the other staff. I would try his cell phone. Some people have been getting text messages from him.
20-09-2005, 02:30 AM
BlessedAmerican

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wacky

you'd be better off trying to contact someone NEAR BM rather than him directly... he's busy!

You can still send a letter to BM at BNM... the adress is lying somewhere around here.

Does Bryan have an office at BNM?
20-09-2005, 02:33 AM
weseeall

A letter is not a summons -- as I stated if this is a summons then there are other alternatives -- since so far it only stated that this was a letter - the best thing to do is not to get involved -- My country also follows British laws and I am very familiar with these type of procedings.

Unless you do not have an alternative you are best removed from testifying in these type of investigation -- they can get you to agree to things you do not believe -- I have seen it done so many times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by argon

I don't think that way Robert,

This is Malaysia and as far as I know you have to attend to these summons. Your best off to speak the truth without telling them to hurry up etc. Just answer questions without being negative seems the best to me.

Always easy to tell someone else what to say or do ...... we don't have to sit there ....
20-09-2005, 02:38 AM
weathernut

Quote:

Originally Posted by weseeall

A letter is not a summons -- as I stated if this is a summons then there are other alternatives -- since so far it only stated that this was a letter - the best thing to do is not to get involved -- My country also follows British laws and I am very familiar with these type of procedings.

Unless you do not have an alternative you are best removed from testifying in these type of investigation -- they can get you to agree to things you do not believe -- I have seen it done so many times.

Very True, Robert! Don't let the Bank Scare you into Responding! Nelsonlee said that if you are not 100% sure of yourself, then Don't Talk to them!

Mike
20-09-2005, 03:45 AM
IMN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin

OKay,i have sent you an PM. I read through your PM again, Please answer to the PM, and i will see what i can do.

Marek

Thank you, Marek, for re-reading my PM to you. I have responded to your PM.

To the other people who have PM'd me and responded to this thread, thank you for your support. I am following this thread diligently and treasure your opinions and advice.

Best regards.
20-09-2005, 10:40 AM
argon

Quote:

Originally Posted by weseeall

A letter is not a summons -- as I stated if this is a summons then there are other alternatives -- since so far it only stated that this was a letter - the best thing to do is not to get involved -- My country also follows British laws and I am very familiar with these type of procedings.

Unless you do not have an alternative you are best removed from testifying in these type of investigation -- they can get you to agree to things you do not believe -- I have seen it done so many times.

Thanks Robert, I stand corrected!

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 PM.