Thread: Anyone in direct contact with Bryan/Sharon?

Originally Posted by IMN

To those who claim to have direct contact with Bryan/Sharon,


I urgently need to communicate with Bryan or Sharon. It is concerning the letter from the Central Bank of Malaysia which a relative of mine received (I introduced him to Pips).

I need an urgent response, please, the appointment with Bank Negara Malaysia (the correct acronym being BNM) is on September 26, 2005.

If anyone can help with this, kindly PM me. I tried the admin of ROLclub but I guess he's too busy to reply to PMs.

Best regards.

His cell phone number is listed over at TG. Along with Sharon's and some of the other staff. I would try his cell phone. Some people have been getting text messages from him.

Originally Posted by Wacky

you'd be better off trying to contact someone NEAR BM rather than him directly... he's busy!

You can still send a letter to BM at BNM... the adress is lying somewhere around here.

Does Bryan have an office at BNM?

A letter is not a summons -- as I stated if this is a summons then there are other alternatives -- since so far it only stated that this was a letter - the best thing to do is not to get involved -- My country also follows British laws and I am very familiar with these type of procedings.

Unless you do not have an alternative you are best removed from testifying in these type of investigation -- they can get you to agree to things you do not believe -- I have seen it done so many times.

Originally Posted by argon

I don't think that way Robert,

This is Malaysia and as far as I know you have to attend to these summons. Your best off to speak the truth without telling them to hurry up etc. Just answer questions without being negative seems the best to me.

Always easy to tell someone else what to say or do ...... we don't have to sit there ....

Originally Posted by weseeall

A letter is not a summons -- as I stated if this is a summons then there are other alternatives -- since so far it only stated that this was a letter - the best thing to do is not to get involved -- My country also follows British laws and I am very familiar with these type of procedings.

Unless you do not have an alternative you are best removed from testifying in these type of investigation -- they can get you to agree to things you do not believe -- I have seen it done so many times.

Very True, Robert! Don't let the Bank Scare you into Responding! Nelsonlee said that if you are not 100% sure of yourself, then Don't Talk to them!

Mike

Originally Posted by Admin

OKay,i have sent you an PM. I read through your PM again, Please answer to the PM, and i will see what i can do.

Marek

Thank you, Marek, for re-reading my PM to you. I have responded to your PM.

To the other people who have PM'd me and responded to this thread, thank you for your support. I am following this thread diligently and treasure your opinions and advice.

Best regards.

Originally Posted by weseeall

A letter is not a summons -- as I stated if this is a summons then there are other alternatives -- since so far it only stated that this was a letter - the best thing to do is not to get involved -- My country also follows British laws and I am very familiar with these type of procedings.

Unless you do not have an alternative you are best removed from testifying in these type of investigation -- they can get you to agree to things you do not believe -- I have seen it done so many times.

Thanks Robert, I stand corrected!