Al-Hashimi: Letter of Board of Representatives mysterious.. And the veto is still in force
Deputy President Tariq al-Hashemi letter received from the leaders of parliamentary blocs on Wednesday ambiguous, and demanded explanations and interpretations and to resolve the Council's position of the sovereignty of the proposed amendments to the law.
A statement from Hashemi's office received by the independent press (Iba) a copy of Vice President of the Republic received yesterday a message from the President of the Chamber of Deputies with a request lodged by a number of leaders and representatives of the political blocs in parliament.
He included a message that those blocks reached a "compromise formula" and after that "I understand the parliamentary blocs Hashemi keen on guaranteeing the rights of voters outside the country," therefore propose to withdraw the veto sovereignty of Article I of the election law in the light of the formula contained in that letter.
He expressed the Information Bureau of Hashemi extremely surprised that some of the leaders and representatives of parliamentary blocs who have put their signatures to the request filed yesterday, they themselves were the first who claimed not to veto a constitutional resolution issued by al-Hashemi and they are demanding a withdrawal of the veto in the implicit recognition of the constitutionality of the verdict which is guaranteed by the Constitution to the Presidency.
He said if al-Hashemi to set aside the election law is unconstitutional, as some claim Ben-ignored, as the electoral law in force and no message here to request the withdrawal of the veto and the contrary has allowed the Constitution of the Council has several options response veto or approve it and make the necessary amendments to articles Almnicodp exclusively materials without opening the election law be discussed again.
The Office in its statement that it "did not appear in the letter any reference to minority quotas or the amendment proposed by al-Hashemi in Article III -4" and wondered "Why is this intentional disregard of minority rights" ...
http://translate.googleusercontent.c...1PO_0JOBcb8fBA