Transparency and credibility of factual facts

فتاتين بريطانيتني مصدومتان من تعاليم الاسلام! وبابا كمان مسلم تقول احدهما ومنصور يتفاجأ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVE2P8BnCjM نصرانية اعتنقت أختها وأقاربها الإسلام جاءت للتعرف على تعاليم الإسلام | يوسف https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hB8FRfFmgo منصور يسحق نظرية 'تطور الزرافة' أمام ملحد هندي! شاهد كيف تحول 'العالم' إلى تلميذ عاجز https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKLJC7gg9uQ حاول الطعن في القرآن والكذب على النبي! فقام علي دعوة بسحقه فأنقلب السحر على الساحر وتلعثم! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x313eBRxseg

two bible verses in particular sum up the position of women: "I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." By this third chapter of Genesis, woman lost her rights, her standing—even her identity, and motherhood became a God-inflicted curse degrading her status in the world. In the New Testament, the bible decrees: "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." 1 Tim. 2:11-14 One bible verse alone, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" (Exodus 22:18) is responsible for the death of tens of thousands, if not millions, of women. Do women and those who care about them need further evidence of the great harm of Christianity, predicated as it has been on these and similar teachings about women? Church writer Tertullian said "each of you women is an Eve . . . You are the gate of Hell, you are the temptress of the forbidden tree; you are the first deserter of the divine law." Martin Luther decreed: "If a woman grows weary and at last dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing, she is there to do it." Christian writings therefore indeed regard the intelligence of women as inferior to that of men. According to the Bible women, sources of evil and corruption from "original sin" should remain silent in churches and they should not be given the opportunity to teach or educate a male audience.

Thus, we saw that the law of the levirate was an injustice towards the woman, because it obliges her to marry the brother of the husband if he dies without leaving children, and in default of the brother, it is the nearest relative and so on. As long as the husband has not had children, his wife will be required to marry a man of her family in order to have children, so that the line of the deceased is not erased. Thus, according to the Bible adultery is one who has slept with a married woman, which means that the man is not punished because he cheated on his wife if he has one, but simply because he slept with his neighbor's wife. Conversely, according to Islam adultery is any person, man or woman, who cheats on his spouse. The bible establishes woman's inferior status, her "uncleanliness," her transgressions, and God-ordained master/servant relationship to man. Biblical women are possessions: fathers own them, sell them into bondage, even sacrifice them. The bible sanctions rape during wartime and in other contexts. Wives are subject to Mosaic-law sanctioned "bedchecks" as brides, and male jealousy fits and no-notice divorce as wives. The most typical biblical labels of women are "harlot" and "whore." They are described as having evil, even satanic powers of allurement. Contempt for women's bodies and reproductive capacity is a bedrock of the bible. The few role models offered are stereotyped, conventional and inadequate, with bible heroines admired for obedience and battle spirit. Jesus scorns his own mother, refusing to bless her, and issues dire warnings about the fate of pregnant and nursing women..

متحدث جديد يفاجئ الجميع بأسلوبه الهادئ وبلاغته في ركن الخطباء https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NfPIl_I528 الداعية عثمان بن فاروق مع قس نصراني .. مناظرة أثمرت بإسلام شرطي كان يستمع لهما https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-QtE-aBp4s هل كتاب الأناجيل شهود عيان لعيسى أم هذه أقاويل مبالغ فيها؟ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB_U3Lb7iG8&t=1s

The Bible has too many false stories for the crucifixion story to also be taken literally. Ironically, considering that it was apparently done by the people from whom we have the most records of litteraly every minutiae of every aspect of their doings in that era, no, the Romans didn't record an incredibly influential person being executed and then rising from the dead. We have accounts of the event that claim to have been dictated by four men (the gospels of Luke, John, Matthew, and Mark) none of which were eyewitnesses to the ministry of Jesus. We even have the journals of a close friend of Pontius Pilate, which offers no record of the event. No - there are no other records outside the bible referencing Jesus, the crucifixion or the resurrection. It is claimed that some contemporaneous reference was made to Jesus and his followers by Josephus but there is some scholarly suspicion that these references were added by Christians some time later.

It's funny that the resurrection of a dead man did not make the news of the time, or that nobody made a note of all the tombs opening and the dead wandering the streets as claimed in the bible …. Its almost as it it never happened ! It's impossible that on the Easter event, the dead get out of their tombs and graves and walk around town and nobody writes it down. If either of these had happened, we'd have at least a dozen surviving accounts from those historians. Instead, there are zero. The bible isn't a record of anything, but some historians say there was a very different story of the crusifiction that the bible fabricated to further their narrative, this account states that this fella Jesus was in fact real, but he was not the son of God, The bible is not a record of the crucifixion. The first of hundreds of versions of the bible was written a century after the supposed event took place. It is a collection of lore, stories of past times passed to succeeding generations by word of mouth. The bible is a story.

Was Jesus (pbuh) really Crucified? by Dr Zakir Naik www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGzS9sfC8P0&t=25s Jesus was not crucified according to 1st Century Christians https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKvfOErSeCA 🇮🇳✝🔥مسيحي هندي يحاول شرح الثالوث… وينتهي به الأمر في حيرة! 😂🤯‼ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9256n60ME 🤯🔥‼مناظرة ملحمية! الشيخ عثمان في مواجهة طلاب مسيحيين حول الكتاب المقدس والقرآن والتناقضات! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udkVdMBKgh4&t=2s 😂✝🔥مناظرة مضحكة 2 ضد 1! وعّاظ مسيحيون لم يتوقعوا ما حدث! لا تفوّت المشاهدة! 🤯‼ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTIVgcUzjhM 😳🔥‼نهاية النقاش! بعد هذا الطرح… لن يذكروا موضوع سنّ عائشة مرة أخرى! لا تفوّت المشاهدة! 🤯📚 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTrBlMU6Yf8

Christians often claim that Islam was spread by force, while Christianity was spread by faith. This myth propagated by these Christians has been sufficiently refuted . In reality, Christianity certainly did not spread by faith and in peace, this was true from the start, but very quickly it was the Christians who were going to impose their faith under duress, this with the help of the emperors. and the great bishops. In early Christianity, as Christians were not powerful, they were forced to limit themselves to simple conversions, as the Romans persecuted them. However, once Christianity has been declared a state religion, the opposite will happen: From the fourth century, the change in attitude of political power radically modified the conditions for Christian expansion: Christianity passed from a situation in which it was outlawed, and sometimes persecuted, to a situation of freedom. , then favorably, until its main rival, paganism - or rather what we put under this term: the traditional religions received in the Roman Empire -, are themselves outlawed . Christianity will become the state religion, the Empire will officially become Christian. The Christianity of Constantine at the Arab conquest, Pierre Maraval, Chapter 1, The religious policy of the emperors from Constantine to Heraclius and that of the barbarian kings, page 5. we can say that Christianity, apart from the early days when it did not have many followers, then spread not by faith but by sword and constraint. It is not nothing to destroy the temples of the pagans, to forbid the practice of a faith other than that of the Catholics, to force people to be baptized, to punish apostates with death, etc. once the deception of a tolerant Christianity is refuted. The majority of Christians and non-Christians believe that Christianity is a religion of love and tranquility which forbids violence, that Christians must be patient in the face of the sufferings they endure and that a Christian can never use violence to convert someone to Jesus. And yet, these are just unfounded words. Who could believe that a God who ordered so much slaughter in the Old Testament would change his demeanor so as to change complement? God willing, we will demonstrate that Christianity, the NEW TESTAMENT, commands Christians to convert by force and retribution those who do not want to become Christians. Here is a parable in which Jesus commands people to be forced to convert to Christianity We can therefore see that the verse Luke 14.23 orders Christians to convert non-Christians by force. Here is a parable in which Jesus commands people to be forced to convert to Christianity:

Luke 14 16 Then said he unto him, A certain man made a great supper, and bade many: 17 And sent his servant at supper time to say to them that were bidden, Come; for all things are now ready. 18 And they all with one consent began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused. 19 And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them: I pray thee have me excused. 20 And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come. 21 So that servant came, and shewed his lord these things. Then the master of the house being angry said to his servant, Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor, and the maimed, and the halt, and the blind. 22 And the servant said, Lord, it is done as thou hast commanded, and yet there is room. 23 And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled. . Also, the word compulsion which is anagkazo was used in Matthew 14.22 when Jesus compelled the disciples to get into a boat. Forcing someone to do something against their will, #Ex 3:19. Evolving Biblical Dictionary (vers. 2). In fact, the word anagkazo has also been used in the sense of forcing someone physically, for example, let's look at how Paul forced Christians to blaspheme Acts 26.11 11 Many a time I went from one synagogue to another to have them punished, and I tried to force them to blaspheme. I was so obsessed with persecuting them that I even hunted them down in foreign cities. To this the question we ask ourselves is: is this really a peaceful and wonderful religion? We think, in any case hope, that the obvious answer from everyone in their right mind, is no. Our conclusion is that Christianity is not a peaceful religion, rather this conception is a myth, Christianity is a religion which calls for war against those who are not Christians, and which practices forced conversion

مهم لكل شاب!! ماذا يحدث لك حين تشاهد الإباحية وما هي الحلول للتخلص منها؟ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS3bdOSjXko مغالطات الإلحاد الغير منطقية - حوار صبور مع روب حول الإلحاد - الجزء الأول https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-lNx0c-R5w