Thread: Transparency and credibility of factual facts

Luke’s Gospel also describes the birth of Jesus during the census of Quirinius almost a hundred years earlier The oldest prototype christian brand bibles date from the late 4th century and are known as Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. These two hand written human authored books are very different from each other and the centuries later KJV bible and versions based upon it in circulation today are very significantly different from the 4th century original prototypes. Philo Judaeus was born in 20 B.C.E. and died 50 C.E. He lived as the greatest Jewish-Hellenistic philosopher and historian of the time and lived in the area of Jerusalem during the alleged life of Jesus. He wrote detailed accounts of the events that occurred in the surrounding area. Yet not once, in all of his volumes of writings, do we read a single account of a Jesus "the Christ" Nor do we find any mention of Jesus in Seneca's (4? B.C.E. - 65 C.E.) writings, nor from the historian Pliny the Elder (23? - 79 C.E.).If, indeed, such a well known Jesus existed, as the gospels allege, don't you think it's reasonable that, at the very least, the fame of Jesus would not have reached the ears of ONE of these men? Amazingly, we have not one Jewish, Greek, or Roman writer mentioning ANYTHING found in the New Testament.

امرأة مسيحية تهاجم المسلمين فلقنها محمد علي درساً لن تنساه! 😱🔥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqizmLOVwKQ إسرائيل بريئة؟! هل تمزح معي؟! 🔥 مناظرة نارية بين منصور والمسيحي! ⚡️😳 Is Israel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdQr-nt9gic

The beard today is frowned upon in our modern society. Some Jews and Christians think that beards are “old-fashioned”. Although the prophets, peace be upon them had a full beard., it is truly amazing to hear such remarks from the People of the Book. They would have to find out about their own texts, because Jesus had a beard, and secondly then Could Jesus take an insulting appearance? On the contrary, Jesus was applying the Law, . In this law we read: Leviticus 19:27 "'Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard. In other words, Jesus teaches not to touch his beard. There was no Gillette Mac 3 back then to have a woman's skin. Jesus said that he was there to follow the commandments of the Law and not to take a single iota out of it until the end of time according to the Gospel of Matthew in chapter 5. It is therefore appropriate to ask Christians a question: Why they shave their beards? Are they not in contradiction with Jesus? Regardless of Paul's teaching on the validity of the Law, here we are talking about the Word of Jesus and not about an innovator. Besides, shaving the beard is referred to the pagans every time in the Bible.

On the other hand, the prophets had a full beard. Aaron had a beard: Psalm 133: 2 It is like precious oil poured on the head, running down on the beard, running down on Aaron’s beard, down on the collar of his robe. David had a beard: 1 Samuel 21 12 David took these words to heart and was very much afraid of Achish king of Gath. 13 So he pretended to be insane in their presence; and while he was in their hands he acted like a madman, making marks on the doors of the gate and letting saliva run down his beard. The beard was even compulsory. The following example is significant in this sense. Indeed, Hanun cut off half the beards of David's servants. However, King David did not agree to see them until their beards grew back: 2 Samuel 10 4 So Hanun seized David’s envoys, shaved off half of each man’s beard, cut off their garments at the buttocks, and sent them away. 5 When David was told about this, he sent messengers to meet the men, for they were greatly humiliated. The king said, “Stay at Jericho till your beards have grown, and then come back.” What more can I say after that? After this evidence will they stop attacking Muslims or looking at them as if they were from another planet ? It is time for them to realize that their abuses against Islam and Muslims come back to them every time

She converted to ISLAM فتاه امريكيه تعتنق الاسلام: شاهد لماذا؟ - الجزء الأول https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezzhWJHSfDs - New Muslim sister tell her story فتاه امريكيه تعتنق الاسلام وردة فعل اَهلها - الجزء الثاني https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_ybAQ77ouw ذاكر نايك ينسف مفاهيم هندوسية: تناسخ الأرواح وتعدد الآلهة! ردود مبهرة - ذاكر نايك Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjhthEYHY_s

People choose Islam because of its clear and simple belief in one God, a direct connection to the Creator without any helpers or priests, and a complete way of life that provides practical guidance for daily living, family, and inner peace. Spiritual Beliefs Strict Monotheism (Tawhid): Belief in one unique, indivisible God (Allah) who has no partners, equals, or children. Direct Relationship: Praying straight to God with no need for saints, priests, or intermediaries. Reverence for Prophets: Honoring all major biblical prophets, including Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, viewing Jesus as a great human prophet rather than the son of God. Intellectual and Logical Clarity Clear Scriptural Record: Believing that the Qur'an is preserved perfectly in its original Arabic text since the time of Prophet Muhammad. Straightforward Logic: Finding that the theology avoids complex and confusing mysteries, making it simple to understand. Purpose and Accountability: Providing clear answers about why humans exist, paired with the promise of divine justice on the Day of Judgment.

Practical Life and Community A Complete System: Offering clear moral boundaries, rules for clean eating, ethical business, and family structures. Sense of Belonging: Giving new members a strong, welcoming, and active global community (Ummah). Inner Discipline: Utilizing daily prayers (Salah) and fasting (Ramadan) to create routine, mindfulness, and peace. Intellectual and Moral Appeal Logical Framework: An emphasis on reason, learning, and reflection as paths to strengthening faith. Comprehensive Guidance: Clear moral, social, and family ethics that provide order and discipline in daily life. Universal Equality: A strong emphasis on social justice, brotherhood, and racial equality across all communities.

HAMZA EXPLAINS WHY HE CHOSE ISLAM - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PH-uo1G3xw4 طالبة الكتاب المقدس تقرأ آية أخفتها عنها كنيستها|BIBLE STUDENT READS A VERSE HER CHURCH HID FROM HER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJkqCrs6ww

Paul said those who oppose him should be castrated themselves...talking about the Jews (Judaizers). His resurrecting god-man savior was not the same as Jesus the rabbi, who called his followers to not only follow the Law, but do MORE than the Law required. Paul set the Law aside - Jesus didn't (at least, according to what's written about him in the earliest accounts). Paul never met the historical Jesus Paul didn't know much about Jesus actual life...never mentioned the virgin birth, or what he taught in much detail at all. Paul often misquoted Jewish scripture in order to make his case, so he was not the "learned Pharisee" he claimed to be, as they would not have made those mistakes. Paul's claimed he got his gospel directly from the Christ in a vision. Jesus never mentions Paul coming along later to preach his gospel, saying that HE was the originator. Paul claims that HE is the source for his teaching, and that we should listen to him. Paul used scripture to make points that were not in keeping with the original writings...look at two passages from his most anti-Semitic letter, Galatians.

Galatians 3:6 - Paul used Abraham as an example of being justified by faith, ignoring the centuries between him and Abraham, where obeying the Law was what justified God's people. Galatians 3:10 - He quoted a curse that was originally from Deuteronomy 27:26. The passage cursed everyone who failed to keep ALL the requirements of the Law. It hammers home the need for the faithful to keep the Law and follow it in order to be obedient to God. Paul makes the opposite point, which is that those who follow the Law are cursed - the exact opposite of the original intent of the passage. No wonder the Jesus Movement disagreed with him and fought him at every turn - in their minds, he was bastardizing the movement, and teaching that the Torah was not essential. If Paul wanted to say that following Torah or the Law was not what was needed for believers, he could have just said that Jesus himself didn't follow it...but Jesus DID follow the Law, and Paul was not really concerned with the historical Jesus much. Jesus was a Jewish teacher (rabbi) who said that not one piece of the Law would pass away before it was fulfilled in the Kingdom of God (Matthew 5:18). Jesus here states that he has not come to abolish God's law or the prophets, but to fulfill them.