Please visit our sponsors

Rolclub does not endorse ads. Please see our disclaimer.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Investor
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 76 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Iraqi leadership's failures raise pressure on U.S.

    THIS IS A REALLY INTERESTING READ....

    Iraqi leadership's failures raise pressure on U.S.
    By Paul Richter, Times Staff Writer
    May 21, 2007

    WASHINGTON — As Iraq's government compiles a record of failure, the Bush administration is under growing pressure to intervene to rearrange Baghdad's dysfunctional political order, or even install a new leadership.

    Publicly, administration officials say they remain committed to Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, even though after a year in office, his elected government has failed to complete any important steps toward political reconciliation — the legislative "benchmarks" sought by U.S. officials.

    But privately, some U.S. officials acknowledge that the congressional clamor to find another approach will increase sharply in coming months if no progress is made toward tamping down sectarian violence, bringing more minority Sunnis into the government and fairly dividing up the nation's oil resources.

    Intervention "is the eternal temptation for the Americans," said one U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity when discussing internal deliberations. "As we get closer and closer to the fall, and the benchmarks are not met … there will be a growing appeal to the idea that if we can replace the top guy, we can get back on track."

    Although U.S. officials vow not to meddle in the government they helped to create, they have brought their influence to bear again and again, including in Maliki's selection as prime minister in early 2006. In January of this year, top U.S. officials considered, and narrowly rejected, a proposal to try to reorganize the fractious political order around a new moderate coalition.

    Americans could spur change through a multitude of diplomatic channels and could use their influence with other Iraqi groups and leaders to shake up the political order in Baghdad. For instance, Washington could encourage a parliamentary no-confidence vote on Maliki, then quietly work a new coalition to choose a leader to its liking, analysts said.

    Many Iraqis, as well as Arabs from neighboring states, are convinced that a U.S. move is only a matter of time, given the political paralysis in Baghdad. One sign of the rising expectations is that two Iraqi political groups are trying to position themselves to win American backing as a replacement government, U.S. officials said.

    A party headed by former interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, with quiet backing from Saudis, Egyptians and Persian Gulf emirates, has been seeking allies among Iraqi groups and in Washington, U.S. officials said. Hoping to build support, Allawi's allies from neighboring countries tried to arrange for him to attend the meeting on Iraq in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el Sheik this month. The plan was abandoned when Maliki threatened to refuse to take part if his would-be successor was there as well.

    Meanwhile, the party long known as the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the largest Shiite Muslim faction, has been changing its image to make itself appear more in the mainstream — "more presentable," said the U.S. official. In one such sign, the group announced recently that it was dropping the word "revolution" from its name. It is now known as the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council.

    In the United States, congressional pressure on the White House is coming from both parties, and is growing. Although Republican lawmakers have been reluctant to criticize President Bush's troop buildup strategy, they have eagerly expressed their chagrin at Maliki's government.

    "The Iraqi government needs to understand that they're running out of time to get their part of the job done," said Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the Senate minority leader.

    Other Iraqi leaders have long had admirers within the U.S. government. Allawi, a secular Shiite with strong ties to Sunnis, has had advocates in the CIA and the State Department. Allawi's transitional government, installed under strong U.S. pressure, was often accused of corruption, and lost popularity with both Shiite and Sunni Muslims because of his support of U.S.-led military action in Najaf and Fallouja.

    When Allawi ran for parliament in 2005, some officials urged that the administration make a special effort to help his cause, an idea that was shot down by top officials. In the end, his slate received only 14% of the vote.

    Vice President Adel Abdul Mehdi, a French-trained economist and a top Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council official, continues to have supporters in Washington, including Meghan O'Sullivan, a senior National Security Council aide who recently resigned her post overseeing Iraq policy for the White House.

    Since January, when the administration rejected the proposal to try to form a new governing coalition, many officials have taken a more cautious view. They fear that U.S. pressure could alienate Iraqis and undermine Bush administration claims to support democracy, while not delivering results.

    Many outside analysts warn against intervening and question the value of new leadership during a period of crisis.

    "There is going to be a constant temptation to try to rearrange the government…. But fundamentally, institutions are what matter," said Danielle Pletka, a vice president at American Enterprise Institute, a Washington institute with ties to the White House. "One guy does not a success make."

    Maliki is not a "transcendent, charismatic figure," said Ellen Laipson, president and chief executive of the Henry L. Stimson Center, a Washington think tank. "But there's no guarantee that if we changed parties we'd get something we liked."

    The current U.S. approach is to try to pressure and cajole the Maliki government to adopt the key measures aimed at political reconciliation. U.S. objectives include one law that would divide oil revenue among the ethnic and sectarian groups, and another that would help onetime members of Saddam Hussein's banned Baath Party to reenter government.

    A parade of U.S. officials, including Vice President Cheney, has visited recently with Maliki. On his stop in Iraq early this month, Cheney "gathered [Iraqi officials] in his embassy and told them, 'Very frankly, you have to do something,' " recalled Mahmoud Othman, a Kurdish lawmaker. " 'If you don't deliver, we can't defend you.' "

    So far, the U.S. strategy has yielded few results. In February, U.S. officials declared that victory was at hand on the oil law. But since then, progress has ground nearly to a halt.

    In a recent conference call, a U.S. official in Baghdad shocked diplomats at the State Department's Foggy Bottom headquarters in Washington with a gloomy status report on the oil law. A Washington diplomat, taken aback, blurted, "What do you mean? We've been claiming it as a success. The president's been lauding it," recalled one person who was there.

    In one limited attempt at intervention, U.S. officials have pushed a proposal to shift the distribution of power in the country. They want Maliki to work on major decisions with Iraq's presidency council, comprising three officials whom Washington considers constructive and moderate: President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd; Vice President Abdul Mehdi, a Shiite; and Vice President Tariq Hashimi, a Sunni.

    Maliki at first resisted, seeing the proposal as an infringement on his powers. But lately, U.S. officials said, he has been more open to the idea.

    The Americans also could shape a new government without leaving fingerprints, analysts said.

    The Bush administration could quietly apply its influence in choosing a new prime minister if Maliki's government fell as the result of a no-confidence vote. Under parliamentary rules, only 50 lawmakers are needed to call such a vote. The government falls if it does not win support from half of the 275 members of the body.

    The Al Fadila al Islamiya party and the bloc led by Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr already left Maliki's coalition this year.

    "If any further deputies were to desert him, it is hard to see how Maliki could win a vote of no confidence," said Juan R. Cole, an Iraq expert at the University of Michigan.

    Still, organizing a new government would probably take months, time that the Bush administration doesn't really have. And to hope that the next prime minister will be a success requires a good deal of optimism.

    Americans have introduced the country's first three prime ministers with the same accolades, praising Allawi, Ibrahim Jafari and Maliki as "hands-on guys, who can make the tough decisions, who we can work with," the U.S. official recalled. But in each case, the pattern quickly changes. Said the official: "It's enthusiasm, then disenchantment."

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...eadlines-world
    __________________

  2. Sponsored Links
  3. #2
    Senior Investor
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 76 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    REMEMBER LAST WEDNESDAY'S MEETING AT THE PRESIDENT's HOME?


    "...In one limited attempt at intervention, U.S. officials have pushed a proposal to shift the distribution of power in the country. They want Maliki to work on major decisions with Iraq's presidency council, comprising three officials whom Washington considers constructive and moderate: President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd; Vice President Abdul Mehdi, a Shiite; and Vice President Tariq Hashimi, a Sunni..."
    "...Maliki at first resisted, seeing the proposal as an infringement on his powers. But lately, U.S. officials said, he has been more open to the idea..."

    This was the start of this new policy and SO FAR it has generate the deal that will bring the constitutional ammendments 140/142, Sunni Civil Rights and (if these others pass) HCL Tuesday for a vote (hopefully passing all by Wednesday - as this then goes back to the President's Council late Wednesday, published in the Gazette by Thursday...RV...Late Thursday night/Friday Morning...just in time for Friday's Signing of the WTO Intent to join...and before coming to the oil conference on the 27th)
    Last edited by fredgwest1999; 21-05-2007 at 04:29 PM.

  4. #3
    Senior Investor
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 76 Times in 5 Posts

    Smile

    BEFORE SOMEONE SAYS...BUT, I've just read that....PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING POINT OF VIEW (TIA):


    We were always told and advised that the disinformation around the RV would require hip-boots or wings (in this case) to stay above.

    Many articles on the Kurds being against the oil law are old and a re-hash of stories from several weeks ago...How do I know? Look closely at the terminology and events that populate these stories...there is one posted today that people are referring to that mentioned that the oil minister had just said that oil contracts done without the oil law in place would be illegal...that event happened over three weeks ago...I read that as breaking news...but, three weeks ago.

    The other thing to be causious of is the quote(s) from this MP or that MP...look at the American Congress...some of these people being quoted would be like asking Trent Lot on an abortion bill.

    See, you need to know who is being quoted and where are they in the leadership of their party and please remember that junior MPs will vote as there party leadership tell them to.

    Like "RR" said in his post today...these votes will be decided with a phone call between the real power brokers and not by some junior MP who wanted the folks back home to know that he is hard at work by getting himself/herself quoted in the newspaper.

  5. #4
    Senior Investor shotgunsusie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    TOP OF THE WORLD!
    Posts
    6,127
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    2,187
    Thanked 11,082 Times in 416 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fredgwest1999 View Post
    BEFORE SOMEONE SAYS...BUT, I've just read that....PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING POINT OF VIEW (TIA):


    We were always told and advised that the disinformation around the RV would require hip-boots or wings (in this case) to stay above.

    Many articles on the Kurds being against the oil law are old and a re-hash of stories from several weeks ago...How do I know? Look closely at the terminology and events that populate these stories...there is one posted today that people are referring to that mentioned that the oil minister had just said that oil contracts done without the oil law in place would be illegal...that event happened over three weeks ago...I read that as breaking news...but, three weeks ago.

    The other thing to be causious of is the quote(s) from this MP or that MP...look at the American Congress...some of these people being quoted would be like asking Trent Lot on an abortion bill.

    See, you need to know who is being quoted and where are they in the leadership of their party and please remember that junior MPs will vote as there party leadership tell them to.

    Like "RR" said in his post today...these votes will be decided with a phone call between the real power brokers and not by some junior MP who wanted the folks back home to know that he is hard at work by getting himself/herself quoted in the newspaper.
    and if you notice most of the kurds not happy articles are being published at iraqiupdates website which ive said repeatedly publishes old news and its usually with a slant.

    (hilarious trent lot synonym)
    JULY STILL AINT NO LIE!!!

    franny, were almost there!!

  6. #5
    Senior Investor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,265
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    2,086
    Thanked 1,574 Times in 141 Posts

    Default

    Fredgwest1999, Thank you for that explanation.

    SGS, I agree that "Iraqiupdates" site are always 2 to 3 days late if not more in updating their site as well.

    So Come On RV, It's not "Git R Done" anymore.....It is now " Git R Passed"

    RV here we come........

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Shreveport,LA
    Posts
    234
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Do you guys think part of what the USA is pushing for is the RV?

    Why or why not?

  8. #7
    Senior Investor rvalreadydang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,989
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 2,467 Times in 238 Posts

    Default

    hmm coinkeedink that the usa is opening up the iraqia factories?? I think not!
    it can be said for all investors from the Arabs and foreigners, you enter now for it will be a golden opportunity for you.

  9. #8
    Investor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    the SHOW ME state
    Posts
    326
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 30 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    i know that my particular part of the U.S.A. is pushing for it!
    money cant buy happiness, but you can rent it for a few days.

    2 wrongs dont make a right, but 3 rights make a left.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    130
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 121 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChiefWealth53 View Post
    Do you guys think part of what the USA is pushing for is the RV?

    Why or why not?

    The US, is not just pushing for an rv. They have orchestrated it, and are using it as a bargaining chip. The oil laws production sharing agreements are not the most favorable for the Iraqis. They are using the RV as a giant carrot to lure all the factions to the table and sign off on the oil law. jmho.

    Michael

  11. #10
    Senior Investor lewscrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lovespark, Illinois
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 501 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    Excellent observations Fred! Thanks so much for your insight!

    lewscrew
    The task ahead of you is never as
    great as the POWER behind you.

  12. Sponsored Links
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Share |