Well, HCI has gone to the bye-bye list on M*G forum. No new posts since April, so that exciting plan rates right up there with watching paint dry on Friday night. I think they finally cracked the 20,000 membership, but only because you can now buy up to 9, yep you read that right, 9 additional policies for each member. What a deal. Maybe Stella will prod the Trust into allowing GPP'ers the same opportunity instead of the measley 250,000 additional policies.

I doubt if chico is back. He was challenged on another forum as to why he was posting on T* and here when he had told everyone how bad they were. Didn't sit well with him. I think he went to his room to pout. I hope not, because I enjoyed his entertainment value, even though he could not keep his stories straight.

Due ot pressing business issues, I won't be around much which I am sure is good news to many on this forum. Besides, there is no sense in playing chico's word games when he keeps contradicting himself within the same sentence. He is more like a dog chasing his tail. Wouldn't know what to do with it if he caught it. I will drop in for a look around once-in-a-while, but doubt if I have much time to post. I wish all of you the very best, and yes that applies to you chico. Much bigger fish to fry, so must get to it. Blessings to all.

moncheri, some thoughts for you to ponder: GPP has told everyone that the Trust Partners are successful businessmen. It stands to reason that successful businessmen would utilize the services of a bank. So why did these successful businessmen use the services of an offshore bank, money routed through 3 Latvian ladies, and other money transfer agents; all costing GPP and the members extra fees than a conventional bank? I am not talking about the funding of the policies, but for the payment of the members fees. Doesn't this seem odd to you that they would be willing to incur fees up to 2-3 times more than their own bank fees for a mere $35? Would you willingly pay $5 for transferring money, or would you rather pay $2? Well, GPP willingly paid $5 for a $2 transfer fee.

The members were also told that the Trust Partners were making up the difference between what they charged the members and what the actual admin fees were for this program. That came straight from Stella, so this has to be true because we all know Stella doesn't lie. Well, at least not until she gets caught at it. Adding this to their cost, how is this being a successful businessman? A successful businessman does not add to his costs, but is always looking for ways to reduce his costs, especially monetary transaction fees. It is one of the easiest things to reduce, and increase the bottom line. Instead here we have "successful businessmen" adding extra fees thus reducing their profitability. I don't call that being a successful businessman, do you?

Given today's economic climate world-wide has made this program impossible to be fulfilled. There is no way they can do this, even if it was real, and make a profit off of it right now. The average premium costs they illustrated are no longer valid due to fluctuating currency prices, and even if they could borrow, their borrowing costs have gone up more than 7% due to the economic climate we are in. Just a few of the reasons why this sounded good, but when you break it down loses its luster.

Now there are many more issues I could present to you that says why this is a scam. But if these above don't convince you, the others won't either. No matter what you believe, or don't believe, is only up to you. I just hoped I was able to better inform you of things that need to be considered in making up your mind. Wishing you all the very best.

*****

Noticed you totally ignored your being caught in another lie, but then I didn't expect you to ever admit you lie. Maybe before I have to leave for business I should post all the lies of yours. Nah, I don't have that much time to compile them all, and it would take about 2 pages to list them all. Won't waste valuable bandwidth showing what everyone else already knows. It is called redundacy. But thanks for dropping by. Next time stick around and actually answer something for a change. I'm sorry, I forgot who I was talking to there for a moment. You answering anything is an oxymoron.

In regard to your above post, I am re-posting it here for reference:

I doubt if chico is back. He was challenged on another forum as to why he was posting on T* and here when he had told everyone how bad they were.

Another LynnRE LIE!

So how is this a lie? I underlined and bolded a key word in my statement for this reason. Reading comprehension is definitely not one of your abilities. I didn't say "NEVER," "WON'T," or "WILL NOT." Had I done so, then you could say I lied. As I said before, you wouldn't know the truth if it came up, sat on your lap and called you Daddy. How about "I talked with the Malaysian Authorities," and then "I never said I talked with the Malaysian Authorities," statements of yours. You know, YOU LIED. You really must learn to keep your stories straight.

******

Since you want to play word games, here are your "direct quotes" which I have provided verbatim: "I didn't say that "I" called the authorities and by he way they did mention that some jerk has been calling them several times demanding info. I wonder who that was. lolololol", so why did you say this, and I quote: "For your information...I have already talked with them." So if you didn't call them, how did you talk with them? Hmm are you sure you are not related to BM? So if "YOU" did not call them, how would "YOU" know that some jerk had been calling them serveral times demanding info?

Now you have said that TroyBank was a scam, but before you said, and I quote: “The entire group that I am with were refunded by TroyBank." Then you said this, and again I quote:[COLOR="blue"] “ TROYBANK..Re-entered a program 10 days after they folded and have paid ever since. SI...Have nearly completed the principle and interest refunds to members."[/COLOR] So, first you and your group got a refund, then it is still paying, and now you said it is a scam. Not bad, only changed your story 3 times on this one. By the way in regard to SI, this notion that they have nearly completed the "principle" (your word) and interest refunds to members is also a lie.

Since you want to play word games, here are your "direct quotes" which I have provided verbatim: "I didn't say that "I" called the authorities and by he way they did mention that some jerk has been calling them several times demanding info. I wonder who that was. lolololol", so why did you say this, and I quote: "For your information...I have already talked with them." So if you didn't call them, how did you talk with them? Hmm are you sure you are not related to BM? So if "YOU" did not call them, how would "YOU" know that some jerk had been calling them serveral times demanding info?

Now you have said that TroyBank was a scam, but before you said, and I quote: “The entire group that I am with were refunded by TroyBank." Then you said this, and again I quote:[COLOR="blue"] [B]“ TROYBANK..Re-entered a program 10 days after they folded and have paid ever since. SI...Have nearly completed the principle and interest refunds to members."[/B] So, first you and your group got a refund, then it is still paying, and now you said it is a scam. Not bad, only changed your story 3 times on this one. By the way in regard to SI, this notion that they have nearly completed the "principle" (your word) and interest refunds to members is also a lie.

Not sure how that happened, but sorry for the duplicate posts. So, now let me see if I have this straight. Chico is now saying he never said the other forum never mentioned his posting on T* or here. So then I guess this quote of chico's is also made up, twisted or taken out of context, and I quote: "WHY would anyone waste time posting in TG and jousting with *****s?" or this one: "I see that Riegel has taught "dreamer" how to dream on RC. Also YB is posting his usual nonsense." and just for fun here's one more: "Why would ANYONE waste time coming to SCAM CENTRAL (TG Forum) to engage in futile arguments with losers who do not use total info when forcing their opinions on investors?"

moncheri: Remember when the Ben Seigler fiasco hit, and Stella said on the forum GPP had nothing to do with him? Well, it seems Stella was not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. A poster on another forum had this to say, and I quote:

"It would appear that that he bailed with SOME of the cash. I am part of a group that gave money to Ben Seigler (lets just call him B.S.) to join GPP. I and the people in that group do show up in GPP’s website as being membersStella is not speaking the truth if she has stated that they have had no dealings with this guy. Hopefully the investigative trail will lead right back to her and everyone associated with promoting GPP and they will all end up in jail together."

So if she lied about this what other "lies" has Stella been telling? But hey, according to chico, what is said on a website doesn't have to be the truth.

You know how you have this little piece of thread that is sticking out that looks unsightly, so you start to pull on it but it just keeps on going and going until a whole section us unraveled; and you have a real mess on your hands? Well, GPP has started its unraveling. This case with Ben Seigler, just like the case in Finland, is just one of those little threads that is going to grow into a big mess, and it is going to cause GPP all kinds of headaches.