Thanks for the info and welcome PIPs to be back soon. God be with you Sir.
Please visit our sponsors
Results 171 to 176 of 176
-
12-12-2005, 03:17 AM #171
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 6
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
-
15-12-2005, 03:20 AM #172
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- USA, Massachusetts
- Posts
- 88
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Who wrote this?
This was in answer to a question on whether the restructured program will go private.
Bryan may not publicly comment on suggestions made, but he does take note of them.
-
15-12-2005, 10:52 AM #173
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 1,740
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sowingseed
-
16-12-2005, 11:12 PM #174
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- USA, Massachusetts
- Posts
- 88
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Hi Shell
A super moderator would have read all 173 post so you would know that, being the super moderator that you really are, but I just fine the message that started the thread. I just don't have time to read what everyone thinks about every post. So I wasn't the only one who pick that up. And I only mentioned it because so many said things like thanks BM or great boss...and like that. But it didn't seem to me like he even wrote it. So why was everyone even thanking him if he didn't write it. I didn't know that question had been delt with on post 10, or 50 or 123. You are really with it Shell to know all this stuf. Thanks, and we are blessed to have you watching over us.
-
16-12-2005, 11:38 PM #175
Sowingseed,
Shell is just letting you know that the question had been answered. If you are going to make a broad statement such as "why was everyone thanking him if he didn't write it" I would assume that you then went back and re-read the thread to discover why Shell would make her comment and decided that the answer was not sufficient? As you have done this perhaps you could give your reasons?
FYI, Bryan originally answered in the third person in another thread where members were saying "Bryan would" "Bryan should comment"etc. Bryan replied with "Bryan may not publicly" etc. Which was in context with what had been originally written. He then took that post and turned it into a new thread.
You know, it is easy to be sarcastic towards moderators, however, you really should be thanking Shell for the effort she puts into this forum. It is not an easy task trying to figure out the legitimacy of every post that is on this forum!
Have a good day.. and happy reading! :)
mezWhen you are angry or frustrated, think: How will this affect my life in a few years time?
-
17-12-2005, 02:41 AM #176
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 1,740
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sowingseed
I understand, Sowingseed, believe me I do ! A new member who comes in and sees the loooong threads is easily discouraged from reading such lengthy threads.
Not that you are a new member but some threads may have slipped away from you and other long time members too.
I am sorry I didn't point you directly to the specific posts where it was explained, but I was really busy when I answered to your post. I will try and be better and point more directly next time someone asks a question like that........
-
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
24 Hour Gold
Advertising
- Over 20.000 UNIQUE Daily!
- Get Maximum Exposure For Your Site!
- Get QUALITY Converting Traffic!
- Advertise Here Today!
Out Of Billions Of Website's Online.
Members Are Online From.
- Get Maximum Exposure For Your Site!
- Get QUALITY Converting Traffic!
- Advertise Here Today!
Out Of Billions Of Website's Online.
Members Are Online From.