The trouble a simplified mind fails to comprehend nor see up front is the fact that LR and PP applies two different rates and charges and is in accordance to the amount in question.

Worst still, is with AP. I wish it was that simple. You just want a straight deal ...well, who WOULDN'T??


You may think, you have the PP sum to just pay for what it is to be on par with another at a straight & equal exchange with his/her LR money. What makes you think, it was an easy think to gain the LR money after going thru some time to obtain it?

Try earning 100 or accumulate $100 on LR and then submit yrself to someone wanting to simply buy off yours with an easy transfer of $100 thru PayPal's money? Put yself in that shoe?

Now, if you say, naaaahhh, I can survive for the next 5 years without any interests to charge or make on... no one will take yr word for it let alone find you credible or trusting.

Then comes the fact, you want to make some exchange income? Fine, nothing wrong with that to be honest. That is not the issue. You ask what you want, pay the dues accordingly so REESE too don't get swelled up or down with a loss to costs involved, which a straight fee like you simply suggest, can do away that easily... in this money world mate, it just doesn't work that way unless U R prepared to be a sucker all the way to the end... now, R U on that path???

The other thing is, if you are not out to make Exchange a good thriving business, only get caught up with incidental needs, then you are not in real need to maintain a qualified REESE exchanger who has to pay a yearly charge to sustain this secured reputation while you only pay the incidental fees that comes with an incidental exchange, thats how business in the Money Exchange thrives in or didn't you know that much?

Another thing about either party that calls off an 11th hour exchange agreement with some prank or rather... REESE will have to impose and compensate the losing side being the victim... it costs more to lose and penalize a REESE Exchanger for unethical conduct but it should be easier to ban and/or impose a heavier sanction on the non REESE exchanger as well...
So, the bottomline is, the straight fee you suggest just don't carry much sense nor is applicable... its too simplified a thinking but with money, responsibility begins with secured measures taken.

Its much easier to hoot out like the way you did... but there's more to it than meets the eye if one were to be taking a straight, honest deal for a road... and if you have difficulty with that, only YOU know why and what the reasons are. 8 out of 10 guys out there are likely scammers, question is when is the right moment to strike and with WHOM!!!

9 out of 10 who wants to see the other scammer sanctioned and/or ban is them self a likely scammer too.

The only chap that is principally a NON scammer is one who is NOT afraid to be subjected with a secure arrangement... he/she has no time for the cheap thrill in cheating others... its not in their blood and its simply, WRONG!!!

Which category R U in to be honest?

YB.

__________________