Quote:
Originally Posted by kingtvrtko  Hello Marek and YB,
Don't get me wrong here. I asked those questions because I am concerned to what could happen in the future if we get too much attention. I am not questioning legitimacy of TF, I have no doubt this is real investment program. I invested some money and I plan to invest much more. But there are a lot of people that don't want to see us prosper and they will do anything to stop us. Because of them I think it is not wise thing to disclose any information to public.
YB we don't need to go outside. Give RC members more time and you will see that more and more of them will join to TF. You are mentioning some target of 100k and higher plan with increased payout percentage. It is nice but let's not be greedy. Let's not hurry, let's develop this program slowly and securely.
Somewhere on the forum I red that you will try to reduce deposit time from 36 months to 24 months. Why? Is it because some potential members are not patient enough? If they can't wait 36 months then obviously they don't believe that this program will last for 36 months. Why do we need those members then? |
Hi Kingtvrtko,
I totally agree with you. Accelerated growth is not always the ideal route. The 100k target mentioned by YB is a great objective, but let's not rush things. I would be for TF to grow "organically" if you see what I mean. PIPS, PLEX and many other "infamous" private programs suffered to same fate because of explosive growth.
There is a proverb that states (I paraphrase) "It is not about how you start, it is about how you finish"
TF could start off with a bang and attract hundreds of thousands of people in absolutely no time - this is indeed a possibility, and maybe a wish by many of you. Call me "burnt", but I would prefer a slow and steady, yet consistent growth for the next 10.....25+ years to come. I am tired of programs that are great in concept and design, and promise to be the one that will be different from all the programs, only to last 3-4 years max ( If at all!!).
I am not saying this is the case for TF. I would opt for a more under-the-radar-but-over-delivering model.
Just my humble opinion
Sir Charles