Sadly, in all these cases the investigation is extended as long as possible so as to justify authorities, receivers, investigators and all the leaches can drain as much as possible from whatever amount was siezed. A case I was researching ended up in negative and the judge refused receivers last payment, which was so grossly inflated that it was a joke. Even the judge was embarrassed over how much money was taken from siezed accounts by receiver who was assigned by court to watch over these assets and money.

This is like putting the fox in charge of guarding the chicken coop. Since most of these regulators follow the same blood sucking leach like system as in U.S., if not worse, I would not expect to see anyone get back more than .10 of the dollar. I have researched dozens of cases in U.S. and this is a consistant factor, the lawyers are the only ones who make out like the bandits they are. lol

Good luck to all, Mike

__________________